• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Imposing Costly Regulation Is Not Real Reform

    President Obama and Democrats in Congress want to impose two costly health insurance regulations nationwide.

    The first is community rating, which prohibits insurers from varying premiums based on an individual’s health status. The second is guaranteed issue, which forces insurers to sell policies to everyone at anytime, even individuals who wait until after they are sick to obtain insurance. Community rating and guaranteed issue are designed to raise healthy people’s premiums in order to subsidize the premiums of high-risk individuals.

    It is important to work to ensure that high-risk individuals can access affordable coverage. However, community rating and guaranteed issue are such inexact, inflationary, and nontransparent efforts at achieving that goal that they can end up being counterproductive.

    States currently regulate health insurance, so to see what effects these regulations could have nationwide, it’s important to look at their impact on state markets.

    Dr. Bradley Herring of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Dr. Mark Pauly of The University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School recently conducted a study “test[ing] for differences…between states with both community rating and guaranteed issue and states with no such regulations.”

    The Herring and Pauly findings should give Democratic policymakers pause:

    “Overall, our results suggest that the effect of regulation is to produce a slight increase in the proportion uninsured, as increases in low risk uninsureds more than offset decreases in high risk insured.”

    In other words, after the regulations were enacted, the number of high-risk individuals who purchased coverage because their premiums went down was somewhat less than the number of low-risk individuals who dropped coverage because their premiums went up.

    An editorial in The Wall Street Journal elaborates on the lack of logic behind such regulatory reforms:

    ObamaCare would impose on all 50 states rules that have already proven to be failures in numerous states. Because these mandates would raise the cost of insurance, ObamaCare would then turn around and subsidize individuals to buy the insurance that the politicians made more expensive. Only in government could such irrationality be sold as ‘reform’.

    Cross-posted at Fix Health Care Policy.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Imposing Costly Regulation Is Not Real Reform

    1. Jessica T., Californ says:

      The Health Care system needs much more than just financial considerations and availability.

      Much more needs to be done to see that the professionals providing the care are actually qualified professionals and they are using their skills to HEAL, not just line their own pockets at the expense of hurting others.

      In addition to my own bad experiences attempting to gain quality care, as well as others whom I know and thousands of others seen on the internet, I've recently been emailed a link to a new blog with a story far worse than my own, and he/she has apparently only begun to tell their tale. There was a bit in his/her tale that reminded me of several known situations, so perhaps it might spark some recognition and contribute to any venue of improvement: http://enoughdangit.blogspot.com/ .

      Something must be done.

    2. Pingback: » Financial News Update - 08/27/09 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country…

    3. Pingback: Nelsonspeak on Health Care « Nebraska Redneck

    4. Todd, Washington says:

      I get the feeling that doctors don't consider my personal financial bottom line when they are treating me and my family members. There needs to be a culture shift; one that respects what people can and cannnot afford. When is financial reality ever going to come into the picture. There is a way to do medicine that is sensitive to this–I just know there is.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.