• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Auto Czar to Become Manufacturing Czar?

    If you like what’s happened to the auto industry, you’ll love this. Bloomberg is reporting today that Ron Bloom — the head of the Obama Administration’s automobile task force — will soon get an expanded portfolio, with responsiblity for crafting Administration policies for all manufacturing industries.

    Yet another Obama Administration czar? Don’t expect the White House to use the dreaded “C” word, but that seems to be the plan. By itself, of course, that’s no bad thing — after all even George Bush had a “manufacturing czar” within his Commerce Department. And there are plenty of positive steps that can be taken to ease burdens on manufacturers. In 2005, in fact, OMB published a list of regulatory changes that could help.

    Unfortunately, the Obama Administration — having just nationalized General Motors — seems to have quite different policies in mind. According to Bloomberg, the new position may be a response by the White House to calls for a full-blown national industrial policy for manufacturing. In recent congressional testimony, Obama advisor and former cable executive Leo Hindery starkly described the elements of such a strategy: government picking winners and losers among products and firms, government spending to support industry, and trade protectionism.

    If all this sounds familar, it should — such “industrial policy” was much in fashion during the 1980s, when proponents endlessly cited the Japanese model of government-directed industry as a model. Of course, today — after a 10-year economic slump in Japan — the model hardly looks so good.

    The last thing America needs is even more federal hands on private industry — neither Japan, Inc. nor Government Motors is the model for the future. Rather, the best “industrial policy” would be to reduce burdens on enterprise. With or without a czar, that would be welcome.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Auto Czar to Become Manufacturing Czar?

    1. Rich, Atlanta says:

      Where does it end? Obama does not need to control industry.

    2. Pingback: Auto Czar to Become Manufacturing Czar? » The Foundry | Auto mation live today

    3. Pingback: Shopfloor » Blog Archive » Investor’s Business Daily on Naming a Manufacturing Czar

    4. Pingback: Auto Czar to Become Manufacturing Czar? » The Foundry | Auto cad live today.

    5. Pingback: News for 08/25/2009- How about corruption reform? And a look at Cloward and Piven « Soldier For Liberty

    6. Pingback: Auto Czar to Become Manufacturing Czar?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.