• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Bad Deal on Burma

    In exchange for the release of John Yettaw, the American who provided Burma’s ruling junta an excuse to extend the house arrest of democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi, Senator Jim Webb provided the junta an opportunity for saturation media coverage of what will pass there as US endorsement of its rule.

    This was a simple transaction. Junta chief Than Shwe got what he wanted, and he gave up something (someone) that had already served the regime’s purpose. It will not lead to a new opening in US-Burma relations – unless of course, the US is prepared to pare its objectives in a way that ensures the regime meets them. As Senator Webb has indicated before, this would entail accepting elections next year under a sham constitution. And, as things now stand, a lowered standard would also have to allow for the continued detention of Suu Kyi, detention of more than 2000 other political prisoners, and Suu Kyi’s prohibition from competing in the elections. That is not a road map. It is capitulation.

    The Obama Administration claims it simply gave Senator Webb the customary support the State Department gives to any traveling Senator. Maybe so. But it may also be a no-lose effort to facilitate a change in policy without really taking a stand in favor of it. “Engagement” and meetings with dictators do not constitute policy unto themselves; they are diplomatic tools. In the most recent expression of policy, the House, Senate, and White House just weeks ago renewed sweeping sanctions against Burma. Until the Administration takes a clear stand on a new policy, Burma, the world, and concerned Americans can only assume that the policy of bringing maximum pressure to bear on Burma’s ruling generals stands.

    The Administration has amply demonstrated that it can secure the release of Americans in difficult circumstances abroad. The verdict is still out on whether it can secure American national interests in the process. Deals like this are a bad sign. Either it is allowing others to drive US policy or it is confusing what is essentially consular work with foreign policy. It is time for the Administration to lay its cards on the table, complete its review of America’s Burma policy and let Washington fight it out.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Bad Deal on Burma

    1. Derek Tonkin says:

      The Burmese media have made it clear that Mr Yettaw was released on compassionate, humanitarian grounds. He is ill, both physcally and mentally, and it would have churlish of Senator Webb not to have asked for his release and for the Burmese not have agreed to this. The issue of Suu Kyi is a toally different matter. She is a very high profile Burmese citizen and nothing that Senator Webb said or did in Burma in any way justifies your conclusion that he gave the regime an excuse to prolong her restricted residence. Already there are signs that the regime is opening up and that Suu Kyi is testing the water on the issue of sanctions and tourism. In short, Senator Webb may have helped to open up the log jam and to get some kind of dialogue going between her and the regime. This was the very most he could have hoped to achieve. He should be congratulated on the results of his visit. Suu Kyi, incidentally, is not debarred from standing in the elections because of her house arrest. The real issue is whether she wants to do so under a seriously flawed Constitution.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×