• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • How Safe Are Pakistan’s Nukes?

    A recently-released study by British academic Shaun Gregory that claims Pakistani nuclear complexes have been attacked on three occasions in the last two years has stirred fresh concerns about the safety and security of Pakistan’s nuclear assets. Ensuring that Pakistani nukes stay out of the hands of terrorists certainly must be priority number one for the U.S. government. However, there is little need to panic about this issue, at least in the short-term.

    The study cites three attacks since November 2007 – one on a nuclear missile facility, one at a nuclear air base, and one a year ago at an armament complex at one of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons assembly sites – as evidence that terrorists are getting closer to gaining access to Pakistan’s nuclear weapons. But as one unnamed U.S. intelligence official noted to reporters, these facilities are well-known, large military facilities and it is not surprising that militants would target them. A more recent attack on a bus traveling through Rawalpindi carrying workers from one of Pakistan’s nuclear labs also has raised concern, since it demonstrates that al-Qaeda does likely have some information about the location and activities of Pakistan’s nuclear programs.

    Before jumping to conclusions that al-Qaeda is about to grab a Pakistan nuke, though, observers should note that the U.S. has been assisting Pakistan with improving the security of its nuclear assets since 9/11 and has spent some $100 million on programs to increase personnel reliability and to establish permissive action links on nuclear facilities. Second, even before 9/11, the Pakistan army had an interest in safeguarding its nuclear facilities and therefore almost certainly has dispersed its nuclear assets throughout the country, making it nearly impossible for terrorists to gain access to an assembled nuclear weapon, especially through a single violent attack.

    A more plausible scenario is one in which extremists infiltrate the nuclear establishment slowly over time and gain access to nuclear materials or technology that could help them eventually build a nuclear device themselves or even a dirty bomb. The fact that elements of Pakistan’s army and intelligence service retain links to extremists who they view as strategic assets in pursuing goals vis a vis Afghanistan and India opens the door for the unwelcome possibility of Pakistani officials (with access to nuclear information) developing sympathy for al-Qaeda goals. Earlier revelations about a group of former Pakistani military officials and nuclear scientists who met with Osama bin Laden in August 2001 remind us of the very real possibility of al-Qaeda gaining nuclear know-how from former Pakistani officials with access to such information.

    The U.S. should have in place contingency strategies in the event the Pakistan military becomes less capable of protecting its nuclear assets. This scenario could arise if the Pakistan military begins to lose resolve in fighting the Taliban in the northwest parts of the country. This seems rather unlikely at the moment. The Pakistan military has demonstrated its ability to oust the Taliban from the Swat Valley, thereby significantly diminishing the possibility of the Taliban gaining increased legitimacy and influence within the country. The recent apparent elimination of Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud in a drone missile strike last week also has given a fillip to Pakistan’s efforts against the extremists.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to How Safe Are Pakistan’s Nukes?

    1. Pingback: Are You Sleeping Soundly At Night? Well, We Can Change That « Around The Sphere

    2. imran says:

      in the jhelum city very old library (lala achit roy) is very poor condition pleas do some thing .

      we will be very grate ful to you

    3. dr kv ranjit,po:prak says:

      the safety of pak news is in serious doubt esp with the hf-f report of a three time attempt to grab it by the terrorists.issues are much more serious in that there were two attempts to use these over india during the kargill conflict in 19999 and in 2001 which was preempted by feeding the info of india retaliating with hydrogen-bomb which is 10 to 100 times more powerful.these were reported by me to the govt here and now internationally and international interventions with media exposure is a must to save israel etc from a n-attack by iran since they are lose enough in developing the a-bomb..the ter acts of pak combined with left ter by china has now enlarged with ulterior motives of gaining or rather grabbing global supremacy in half the time span by subverting or warring with enemies etc as also winning a battle with half the effort.in this context usa has been deeply affected by the deliberately upvalued yuan and enforced low wages by china resulting in most countries having serious trade deficits with china which is the main cause for the economic ills in usa since funds tend to become unavailable for interventionist measures due the insufficient exchange reserves,more details can be found on my facebook page =www.facebook.com/drkvranjit and interesting brain twisting tweets on http://www.twitter.com/drkvranjit as also i am sending a mail to your esteemed foundation-info@heritage.org with evidences of cyber war techniques being used by china which makes a nightmarish scenario.lisa curtis report has been quoted in the english newspaper-the hindu,sat,13/03/10 p=13,c=3-8 in an article titled'let now a threat beyond india:us congress' and which makes for interesting and enlightening reading but coordinated actions are what is even more necessary to prevent an impending(may not be imminent or instant) n-holocaust resulting in a 3rd world war

    4. dr kv ranjit,po:prakkanm,omaloor-elanthoor road,dist:pathanamthitta,kerala-689643,india says:

      my email is drkvranjit@gmail.com and ph&fax:0091-2230926/2223058,mob:+91-9447756458/9387206121/9847040534.i was surprise earlier when the usa president-bo proclaimed that there were three attempts by ter in pak to get at the n-arsenal and the danger of them hijacking/or allowing to be hijacked with operators runs high

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.