• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Get Real About Getting Rid of Nukes

    Although folks like President Obama, U.N. chief Ban Ki-Moon, and IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei have long dreamed of a nuclear-free world, it’s time to get real and admit that the road to zero they want to take is unlikely to get us there. Proponents of denuclearization may have the best of intentions, but their belief that others will quickly rid themselves of nukes only if the U.S. does it first is unrealistic. As Heritage Vice President Kim Holmes explains in today’s Washington Times, their claims don’t stand up to the facts.

    First, unless and until we can render nuclear weapons obsolete with effective missile defenses, and as long as proliferation continues and information on how to build bombs is so readily available, there will be those who seek them. Second, the benefits and prestige of joining the “nuclear club” are all too clear. Iran and North Korea, which have little influence on the world stage, aren’t seeking these weapons to protect themselves from harm or to wreak destruction. Rather, their real aim is to gain influence over our power and policies in their region.

    Since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has dramatically reduced its nuclear inventory, yet the rush of nations to join the nuclear club continues. Worse, reducing our stockpiles may have actually increased the value of nuclear weapons, making them even more desirable than before. The only sure way to reduce the allure of the bomb is for the U.S. to widen the technology gap even further and decrease its value by deploying a comprehensive missile defense system that will explode any reason for them to acquire nukes in the first place. If countries see nuclear weapons technology as a high-risk, low-return investment, they won’t expend the resources to obtain it.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Get Real About Getting Rid of Nukes

    1. Quentin Solberg, Oak says:

      Ms Potter is correct. Advanced high tech missle defense shields are one of the better hopes for real protection from nuclear attack. However, nuclear weapons smuggled into the country over land or via shipping into our ocean ports are equally if not more dangerous than those transported by long range missle. Also, the administrations current position of reducing American nuclear weapons numbers while our current stockpiles degrade from age,and speaking of a nulearweaponfree world while so many nations seek to aquire nuclear weapons is remarkably naive, dangerous and could even be suicidal.I continue to be amazed at Mr. Obama's positions and the logic(?) he uses to arrive at them. Will America or the world be a safer place if these policies are enacted. No. The allure of the bomb will continue well past this Administration and probably most of our lifetimes.

    2. Quentin Solberg, Oak says:

      PS to above- In truth America should increase the levels and the technological sophistication of our whole nuclear arsenal.

    3. Jane Sissom Ryals says:

      thank you for your comments… while I may or may not agree, it is nice to know you still care..

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.