• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Capping the Wild, Wild West's Carbon Emissions

    A look at the states hit hardest by the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade policies immediately reveals a serious regional divide. The regions worst affected? About half the country.

    Testifying before a hearing of the Congressional Western Caucus, The Heritage Foundation’s Senior Policy Analyst Ben Lieberman elaborated:

    The disproportionate burden affects the West. Coal mining will be very hard hit, so Montana and Wyoming and other coal producing states will see this important sector of their economies shrink significantly. Western oil and natural gas producers will face higher costs as well. The promise of oil shale in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming will never be realized under Waxman-Markey.”

    Rather than expanding the nation’s energy possibilities, Waxman-Markey limits them by effectively walling off future access to the nation’s tremendous energy reserves in the West. Moreover, it mandates a wholesale transformation of the economy that cannot be done at low cost. The economic pain inflicted in the process will be staggering. Heritage analysis indicates that so-called green jobs created by this legislation will pale in comparison to those destroyed by the new regulatory scheme.

    The costs Waxman-Markey places on the manufacturing sector are regionally concentrated as well. Lieberman explained:

    Waxman-Markey also disproportionately burdens those states, especially in the Midwest and South, that still have a substantial number of manufacturing jobs to lose, as well as those that rely more heavily than others on coal for electric generation. In addition, because the bill raises energy costs, it hurts rural America much more than urban America.”

    Lieberman pointed to data showing that farmers already spend on average 58 percent more on energy than do urban dwellers, and that disparity is likely to increase significantly under cap-and-trade.

    And then there are the indirect costs. Waxman-Markey stands to fundamentally alter the rural lifestyle by distorting access to energy. Lieberman continued:

    Agriculture is hard hit, and that particularly includes things common in parts of the West that are not well positioned to partially defray their costs by availing themselves of offsets, like ranching on federal lands, fruits and vegetables, and potatoes. And of course the long distances rural westerners have to drive in the course of each day means that gasoline and diesel prices hurt them more than other Americans.”

    It’s little surprise, then, that the politicians pushing cap-and-trade policies represent Hollywood and Boston, two of the areas least likely to suffer significant costs from the proposed legislation. It’s easy to support economic devastation when you’re not paying for it.

    For more, be sure to visit The Heritage Foundation’s Rapid Response page.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Capping the Wild, Wild West's Carbon Emissions

    1. Whicket Williams Kin says:

      The unintended consequences will be so great that the laws will HAVE to be repealed. The people will not alow themselves to be starved because of taxes

    2. Pingback: » Financial News Update - 08/05/09 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country…

    3. Pingback: PA Pundits - International

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×