• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Health Care Reform Cost Estimates: What is the Track Record?

    President Barack Obama has promised the American people that his health care plan “will help bring our deficits under control in the long term.” But so far, the cost estimates coming out of the Congressional Budget Office are not matching up with Obama’s rhetoric. The latest CBO scoring of the Senate’s leading bill, Dodd-Kennedy, estimates that Obamacare will add $597 billion over just the next ten years. Meanwhile, CBO director Doug Elmendorf has said the House health plan will increase the budget deficit by $239 billion over ten years, and “generate substantial increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget window.”

    But a fair-minded person may ask: But those are just cost estimates; what is the federal government’s track record when it comes to accurately measuring the future costs of health care programs? Well, the Senate Joint Economic Committee has released a report studying exactly that issue, and they found that health care plan costs are always dramatically underestimated. From the report:

    Medicare (hospital insurance). In 1965, as Congress considered legislation to establish a national Medicare program, the House Ways and Means Committee estimated that the hospital insurance portion of the program, Part A, would cost about $9 billion annually by 1990.v Actual Part A spending in 1990 was $67 billion. The actuary who provided the original cost estimates acknowledged in 1994 that, even after conservatively discounting for the unexpectedly high inflation rates of the early ‘70s and other factors, “the actual [Part A] experience was 165% higher than the estimate.”

    Medicare (entire program). In 1967, the House Ways and Means Committee predicted that the new Medicare program, launched the previous year, would cost about $12 billion in 1990. Actual Medicare spending in 1990 was $110 billion—off by nearly a factor of 10.

    Medicaid DSH program. In 1987, Congress estimated that Medicaid’s disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments—which states use to provide relief to hospitals that serve especially large numbers of Medicaid and uninsured patients—would cost less than $1 billion in 1992. The actual cost that year was a staggering $17 billion. Among other things, federal lawmakers had failed to detect loopholes in the legislation that enabled states to draw significantly more money from the federal treasury than they would otherwise have been entitled to claim under the program’s traditional 50-50 funding scheme.

    Medicare home care benefit. When Congress debated changes to Medicare’s home care benefit in 1988, the projected 1993 cost of the benefit was $4 billion. The actual 1993 cost was more than twice that amount, $10 billion.

    Medicare catastrophic coverage benefit. In 1988, Congress added a catastrophic coverage benefit to Medicare, to take effect in 1990. In July 1989, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) doubled its cost estimate for the program, for the four-year period 1990-1993, from $5.7 billion to $11.8 billion. CBO explained that it had received newer data showing it had significantly under-estimated prescription drug cost growth, and it warned Congress that even this revised estimate might be too low. This was a principal reason Congress repealed the program before it could take effect.

    SCHIP. In 1997, Congress established the State Children’s Health Insurance Program as a capped grant program to states, and appropriated $40 billion to be doled out to states over 10 years at a rate of roughly $5 billion per year, once implemented. In each year, some states exceeded their allotments, requiring shifts of funds from other states that had not done so. By 2006, unspent reserves from prior years were nearly exhausted. To avert mass disenrollments, Congress decided to appropriate an additional $283 million in FY 2006 and an additional $650 million in FY 2007.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    24 Responses to Health Care Reform Cost Estimates: What is the Track Record?

    1. Pingback: Big Time Conservative » What do you think?

    2. Pingback: Morning Bell: Obamacare Pep Rally Fact Check | Conservative Principles Now

    3. Pingback: 5 Liberal Lies About Obamacare | Lux Libertas - Light and Liberty

    4. Pingback: Pirates! Man Your Women! » Blog Archive » Obamacare: REALITY CHECK!

    5. Pingback: Speaking Of Lying… at Chicks On The Right

    6. Pingback: Obama~~~The PRINCE OF LIES « Romanticpoet’s Weblog

    7. Pingback: The Prince of Lies « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

    8. Pingback: Emperor Obama Liar Liar Pants On Fire! (Part FOUR of FOUR) « 22MOON.COM

    9. Pingback: The Federal Observer » Griffing: The Prince of Lies

    10. Pingback: The HSA Coalition » Is the U.S. Government Bankrupt?

    11. Pingback: Ca. Rep. D. Feinstien / funds gov't Agencie /benefits husband - Page 2 - The Warpath

    12. Pingback: Morning Bell: Is Government Run Health Care Inevitable? | Fix Health Care Policy

    13. Pingback: Morning Bell: Is Government Run Health Care Inevitable? | Conservative Principles Now

    14. Pingback: Representative Paul Ryan Gets It Right On Entitlement Reform | Conservative Principles Now

    15. GAP, League City, Te says:

      5 individuals in the House of Representatives voted in Obamacare. The vote was 220 to 215 in favor of passing this legislation.

      Millions of Americans wrote, called and emailed Congress to defeat this legislation. 5 for and millions against. That shows me how much Congress is paying attention and substantiates my belief that they are arrogant and self serving, intent on power and control over the citizenry.

      The only thing I think can be done is to vote them out of office, so let's do it!


      League City, Texas

    16. Pingback: Abortion and Health Care – Why is this an issue? « Beacon of Truth

    17. Pingback: The New CBO score - Politics and Other Controversies -Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - Page 4 - City-Data Forum

    18. Pingback: Queen of Pith « The Time Has Come

    19. Pingback: Learning from History? The Big Lie … CBO Says that Obamacare is Deficit Neutral, Just Look at Medicare’s Projections | Scared Monkeys

    20. jim tirrell, boca ra says:

      Why has there not been more discussion about the other projections on government programs (Medicare) that have come in so far over projections. These are facts that can''t be denied. As you point out there are many. I'm talking about the press and resposible organizations.

    21. Pingback: What we may end up with is - Page 5 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

    22. Pingback: The Glenn Beck Boycott Gaining Traction - FOX News Losing Money - Page 61

    23. Pingback: More Patients? ObamaCare Will Make It Up On Volume | Hill Talk

    24. Pingback: Pelosi: Repealing ObamaCare Would Do Serious Violence To National Debt | Asian Conservatives

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.