• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Zelaya and Honduras: On the Border of Disorder

    On July 24, like a scofflaw on the run, former president Manuel Zelaya briefly stood on Honduran soil daring the police or army to come arrest him. The government of Roberto Micheletti vows to execute the arrest warrant issued by the Honduran high court before the June 28 ouster of Zelaya. Micheletti is not afraid to argue the case against Zelaya.

    Then unready to surrender, Zelaya swiftly retreated back to safety on Nicaraguan soil. After three days, Zelaya remains camped on the border, apparently declining an invitation to return to Washington to discuss options for solving the crisis.

    The incident on the border demonstrated the characteristics of the deposed leader: folksy, deceptively pacific, yet headstrong, self-centered, an international loose cannon. For hours on the 24th, Zelaya stood in the company of the Venezuelan foreign minister and other foreign well-wishers, his every cell phone conversation, every utterance covered by Hugo Chavez’s television network, Telesur. Like the Pied Piper, Zelaya called for his backers in Honduras to rally to him and descend to the border to meet him, an open invitation to create a mob scene and certain confrontation that could easily lead to bloodshed. Three days later, the fervor of support for Zelaya already appears to be dwindling.

    While leftist friends in Venezuela, Nicaragua, and elsewhere applauded Zelaya’s intemperance, anyone genuinely interested in stability, protection of life, and a workable resolution of the Honduran political crisis shuddered.

    The Obama Administration, which still supports Zelaya’s return, is losing confidence in their man. Secretary of State Clinton remarked sharply on July 24, “President Zelaya’s effort to reach the border is reckless. It does not contribute to the broader efforts to restore democratic and constitutional order in the Honduras crisis. So we urge President Zelaya and all other parties to reaffirm their commitment to a negotiated, peaceful solution to the integrity of Honduran democracy and the safety and well-being of the Honduran people.” Zelaya’s non-appearance in Washington this week will not win him friends.

    Genuine American leadership in Central America and the Western Hemisphere demands support for the preservation of public order, not rule by the mob, and the preservation of constitutional institutions and checks and balances. The Heritage Foundation has expressed its concerns that the Obama Administration’s lost sight of these fundamentals in Honduras.

    For now, Secretary Clinton at least recognizes that the Administration is shackled with a loose cannon of an ex-president whose vainglorious visions of self-vindication eclipse any interest in the well-being of his nation. A solution to the current crisis will require a change of course and international recognition of the real constitutional issues that led to Zelaya’s removal from power on June 28 and continue to be at the core of a just solution.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Zelaya and Honduras: On the Border of Disorder

    1. Winston Smith, Tuval says:



    2. Spiritof76 says:

      If only the US was as brave and strong in defending our Constitution as the Hondurans aren their's. They are the ones that stand for rule of law, not the decadent US Congress.

    3. Gray_Stroke Republic says:

      If only our news media had the guts and integrity to report the strong stand they have on the rule of law and for their own Constitution; which more then what our District of Corruption does here……

    4. Roger S., Ma. says:

      Wait a minute: "…the broader efforts to restore democratic and constitutional order in the Honduras crisis. So we urge… all other parties to reaffirm their commitment to a negotiated, peaceful solution to the integrity of Honduran democracy and the safety and well-being of the Honduran people.” ? It was the democratic and constitutional order of Honduras that ousted Zelaya in the first place.

      One does not negotiate with thugs, so why affirm, let alone reaffirm, that kind of a "solution" for the integrity of Honduran democracy?! If armed bandits enter one's property, one does not achieve peace by "negotiating" to "donate" the half of it, not even the tenth. Why? Because they'll insist upon the whole.

      It was Zelaya's disregard for the provisions of his country's constitution that caused him to be removed. To me that proves that "the integrity of Honduran democracy" is rather intact! Zelaya has certainly NOT practiced or shown any commitment in that direction. It's time for even our not-so-swift Secretary of State to publicly acknowledge this fact.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.