<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The House Bill’s Health Insurance Czar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Headlines &#171; NWI Patriots Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-45840</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Headlines &#171; NWI Patriots Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-45840</guid>
		<description>[...] The House Bill’s Health Insurance Czar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The House Bill’s Health Insurance Czar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger S., Ma.</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-44248</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger S., Ma.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-44248</guid>
		<description>Czar? Who started on the road to giving such, in an American sense, utterly inappropriate job titles to these people? Worse, we now have several of these. Was it some left-spun MSM types who did this? Their editors ought to fire them, or the owners the editors, or &quot;we the people&quot; the owners. 
 
We need neither these Eastern European constructs, nor the violation of Constitutionally guaranteed States&#039; rights they stand for. The only regulation we would need is that if the same insurance company or its controlling organization did business in more than one state, then their products would need to become &quot;portable&quot; between these states. That would be in keeping with the Constitution&#039;s Interstate Commerce Clause, and  would help competition to keep everybody honest.  
 
Above all, no citizen needs the subjugation through Administrative Law-powers that these guys will embody. It&#039;s nothing other than a Federal Executive Branch power grab. Worse, as I understand it, even when in the future WH occupancy changes, as I hope and trust it will, these folks and their fellow &quot;apparatchicks&quot; will remain. They will become the true informal &quot;rulers&quot; of America and all Americans, accountable to nobody and nothing except their own bureaucratic logic or lack thereof, presumably mostly the latter. This is a horror-scenario of the first order. We should leave such shenanigans to the Europeans. They&#039;re more experienced at this and still can&#039;t make it work properly or efficiently. From that fact alone we should all abstract the proper lesson. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Czar? Who started on the road to giving such, in an American sense, utterly inappropriate job titles to these people? Worse, we now have several of these. Was it some left-spun MSM types who did this? Their editors ought to fire them, or the owners the editors, or &quot;we the people&quot; the owners.</p>
<p>We need neither these Eastern European constructs, nor the violation of Constitutionally guaranteed States&#039; rights they stand for. The only regulation we would need is that if the same insurance company or its controlling organization did business in more than one state, then their products would need to become &quot;portable&quot; between these states. That would be in keeping with the Constitution&#039;s Interstate Commerce Clause, and  would help competition to keep everybody honest. </p>
<p>Above all, no citizen needs the subjugation through Administrative Law-powers that these guys will embody. It&#039;s nothing other than a Federal Executive Branch power grab. Worse, as I understand it, even when in the future WH occupancy changes, as I hope and trust it will, these folks and their fellow &quot;apparatchicks&quot; will remain. They will become the true informal &quot;rulers&quot; of America and all Americans, accountable to nobody and nothing except their own bureaucratic logic or lack thereof, presumably mostly the latter. This is a horror-scenario of the first order. We should leave such shenanigans to the Europeans. They&#039;re more experienced at this and still can&#039;t make it work properly or efficiently. From that fact alone we should all abstract the proper lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The House Bill’s Health Insurance Czar &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-44139</link>
		<dc:creator>The House Bill’s Health Insurance Czar &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-44139</guid>
		<description>[...] The House Bill’s Health Insurance&#160;Czar  Posted in Heritage.com by nhiemstra on July 23, 2009   via: Heritage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The House Bill’s Health Insurance&nbsp;Czar  Posted in Heritage.com by nhiemstra on July 23, 2009   via: Heritage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric McBride</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-43250</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-43250</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great to see everyone posting about about the truth finally.  Too bad half of you voted for Obama already. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s great to see everyone posting about about the truth finally.  Too bad half of you voted for Obama already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Czar &#171; Justbkuz</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-43174</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Czar &#171; Justbkuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-43174</guid>
		<description>[...] July 20, 2009 in Who Killed John Galt &#124; Tags: czars, health care reform, Obama, Obamacare    From The Foundry, The House Bill’s Health Insurance Czar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 20, 2009 in Who Killed John Galt | Tags: czars, health care reform, Obama, Obamacare    From The Foundry, The House Bill’s Health Insurance Czar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click,Utah</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-43162</link>
		<dc:creator>Click,Utah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-43162</guid>
		<description>Amen to your statement Jo. We need to let of our nation know 
what a snake in the grass of a PRESIDENT we having leading down the wrong path. We need to put up  big STOP sign lets stop OBAMA. 
Don&#039;t worry about what he says. but what he does. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to your statement Jo. We need to let of our nation know</p>
<p>what a snake in the grass of a PRESIDENT we having leading down the wrong path. We need to put up  big STOP sign lets stop OBAMA.</p>
<p>Don&#039;t worry about what he says. but what he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo,Mich</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-43060</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo,Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-43060</guid>
		<description>Boy, a few more Czars to control us and we won&#039;t need the Congress or any State governments.  Very troubling. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, a few more Czars to control us and we won&#039;t need the Congress or any State governments.  Very troubling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Burnam, Albu</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-43042</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Burnam, Albu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-43042</guid>
		<description>Is there, or not, any scientific hard evidence of &quot;global warming&quot;?  It seems that there is only the liberal view that the subject is supported dead on by many noted scientists.  So I come to Heritage for some answers. 
 
Thank you. 
 
Richard Burnam </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there, or not, any scientific hard evidence of &quot;global warming&quot;?  It seems that there is only the liberal view that the subject is supported dead on by many noted scientists.  So I come to Heritage for some answers.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>Richard Burnam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harvey oklahoma</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-43018</link>
		<dc:creator>harvey oklahoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-43018</guid>
		<description>czar..aword used in russia to identify their dictayor in the eighteenth century.does that explainwhy obama insist on calling his appointees.when he get all these bills passed and make no mistake he will unless the people in this country stop him.he will start the process of slowly doing away with elections,which these bills are the begening of.when this happens he will insist on being called czar hussein obama.its happening </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>czar..aword used in russia to identify their dictayor in the eighteenth century.does that explainwhy obama insist on calling his appointees.when he get all these bills passed and make no mistake he will unless the people in this country stop him.he will start the process of slowly doing away with elections,which these bills are the begening of.when this happens he will insist on being called czar hussein obama.its happening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william spriggs, san</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/18/the-house-bill%e2%80%99s-health-insurance-czar/#comment-43008</link>
		<dc:creator>william spriggs, san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=11009#comment-43008</guid>
		<description>Conservatives should be promoting a positive alternative health care reform proposal based on the Swiss plan?  It is demonstrated to work in the real world vs the Democrat&#039;s bureaucratic nightmare and includes portable individual choice plans, universal coverage, private insurance &amp; get employers out of the picture.  Additional benefits might be to help reduce the catastrophic Medicare deficit &amp; make illegal immigrants help pay for part of their health care costs. 
  
Who would not vote for that! 
  
William Spriggs 
San Rafael, Ca </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives should be promoting a positive alternative health care reform proposal based on the Swiss plan?  It is demonstrated to work in the real world vs the Democrat&#039;s bureaucratic nightmare and includes portable individual choice plans, universal coverage, private insurance &amp; get employers out of the picture.  Additional benefits might be to help reduce the catastrophic Medicare deficit &amp; make illegal immigrants help pay for part of their health care costs.</p>
<p>Who would not vote for that!</p>
<p>William Spriggs</p>
<p>San Rafael, Ca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

