• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Giving Americans Control of Their Own Health Insurance

    Republicans in Congress are making yet another major attempt to reform the health care system, going in a very different direction from the expensive health reform bills proposed by Democrats. Rep. John Shadegg (R-AZ) is set to introduce his Improving Health Care for All Americans Act, which seeks to control costs while promoting greater health insurance portability and choice. The bill offers three main provisions: offer tax relief for those who don’t have employer-sponsored insurance or don’t like their current work place coverage, establish new pooling arrangements for individuals, and facilitate mechanisms for the state to address high cost individuals.

    Tax credits – The Shadegg bill acknowledges that those employees who like their workplace coverage can keep it and continue to enjoy tax exclusion on health benefits. However, there are others who don’t like their employer’s coverage or don’t have access to employer-provided insurance. Tax credits are given to these people, allowing them to go out and buy private plans that best suit their needs. This presents Americans with greater flexibility to choose plans that they like and increased affordability of insurance.

    Individual Membership Associations (IMAs). – Today’s mobile workforce illustrates one of the disadvantages of employer-based coverage. Every time you change jobs or leave the workforce, you lose your coverage. The concept of IMA put forth in the Shadegg bill would give Americans more choices, greater stability, and the same pooling benefits of traditional employer based coverage. Everyday organizations that people belong to, such as church groups and service organizations, could form IMAs. These IMAs would negotiate with private insurance companies, like employers do today, to offer discounted plans tailored for their members.

    Risk-adjustment Mechanisms. – The Shadegg bill aims to encourage and bolster state efforts to develop mechanisms that will address the difficulties facing Americans with high health care costs. Risk adjustment mechanisms, such as high risk pools, are an important feature for a consumer-centered health care system, but should also be mindful to limit taxpayer exposure. A well-designed risk adjustment mechanism gives health plans the right incentives to provide better value to both healthier and sicker enrollees.

    The Shadegg bill offers yet another conservative alternative to reform proposals put forth by President Obama and the leaders in Congress. Unlike President Obama’s plan, which depends on centralizing health care decisions in Washington, the Shadegg bill would put personal health care decisions back in the hands of individuals and families. It would address the major challenges facing the current health care system by promoting increased choice, affordability, and access, while placing control over insurance plans in the hands of the real customer – the patient.

    This Post was co-written by Julius Chen.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Giving Americans Control of Their Own Health Insurance

    1. linda bickers elsmer says:

      i feel our goverment needs to stay out of our insurance,taking our rights to choose.we are losing our freedoms as a american. our country was found on our freedom to choose.our men and women has given their lives for our rights.i do not need obama or congress makeing decisions for whats best for my familys needs.

    2. Luna, NJ says:

      Don't you understand, right now you as an individual have no "rights to choose"

      The only entity that can choose is the company/union/group or whatever that is providing the coverage. It is that entity who picks the company they buy the insurance from, it is that entity who picks the benefits that will be payable (other than those mandated by the states) and it is that entity who picks who get coverage.

      There is NOTHING to stop any employer from changing plans, from the one you like, the one your doctor participates in, the one your hospital accepts to another plan. Leaving you to change doctors, change hospital, change pharmacy, change everything..

      You right to choose is non-existent. It is the employer who makes the choice.

    3. Pingback: ObamaCare Link Fest « The Climate Heretic

    4. Carolyn, Amherst NH says:

      While I appreciate the congressional Republicans putting forth an alternative, it does not go far enough in removing the government from the healthcare sector. The only way the health care crisis will be resolved is by returning to consumer driven health care with insurance only for catastrophic situations. The plan above still relies too heavily on insurance companies as third party payers.

      Instead, preferential tax treatment for employers should be eliminated; direct regulation of health insurance should be removed; individuals should have the opportunity to purchase their healthcare with pre-tax dollars (through individually maintained health savings accounts); and Medicare should be privatized until its obligations to the current generation are fulfilled, then finally dismantled. These three steps would ensure a break down of the third-party payer system and lowering of demand, which in turn would quickly return healthcare prices to their natural, affordable levels.

    5. zeezil, NC says:

      The Republicans need to get light shined on this commonsense plan. They need to talk it up since the Dims always try to pin the "party of no" label on Republicans everytime they disagree with their wacko lefty legislation.

    6. Bill, Houston, TX says:

      I would rather have my employer make healthcare plan decisions than have the "czars" in Washington dictate my healthcare program.

    7. Pingback: The NYT Is Right, Real Choice Should Be Central Goal Of Health Reform | Conservative Principles Now

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×