- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Obama, Medvedev, and Missile Defense

Posted By Emily Rector On July 16, 2009 @ 3:16 pm In Security | Comments Disabled

As President Obama and Russian President Medvedev met in Moscow July 6-8, arms control and missile defense were key issues. Both sides agreed to a preliminary framework [1]for a treaty to replace the START Treaty, which expires in December. However, since before Obama arrived in Moscow, President Medvedev has been tying arms control [2]to the U.S.’s abandoning of the third site in Europe. The third site, a missile defense system proposed by President Bush, includes ten interceptors in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic to protect our allies in Europe against the growing Iranian missile threat [3]. This missile defense system would also, and very importantly, protect the United States from the Iranian threat.

President Obama, in an effort to “reset” relations with Russia, may compromise [4] on this missile defense system in Europe. Giving in on missile defense is a poor choice for United States national security, not to mention that Obama will get nothing in return [5]if he gives up the European missile shield. For example, Russia has explicitly said it will not agree to tougher sanctions [6] on Iran in return for the nuclear arms deal with Washington. What is also important to note is that President Obama has stated he only wants to deploy missile defenses that are proven and cost-effective. The European missile defense system is both [7], and therefore the exact kind of program the President should want to deploy.

Not only is this linkage between nuclear arms reductions and missile defense detrimental to our national security, it sends a clear message to Russia that the United States will comply every time Russia makes a demand, even if it is unfounded. As the Senate discusses the Defense Authorization for the 2010fiscal year, it should remember to keep U.S. national security at heart. One way it should do that is to return funding for the third site in Europe to protect our allies abroad and Americans at home.


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/16/obama-medvedev-and-missile-defense/

URLs in this post:

[1] preliminary framework : http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-07-14-voa52.cfm

[2] tying arms control : http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-07-15-voa37.cfm

[3] Iranian missile threat: http://www.missilethreat.com/thethreat/pageID.247/default.asp

[4] compromise: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0715/p02s01-usmi.html

[5] nothing in return : http://www.kansascity.com/273/story/1322450.html

[6] not agree to tougher sanctions: http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE56D1CR20090714

[7] The European missile defense system is both: http://prague.usembassy.gov/md704-factsheet.html

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.