• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Delegate Norton Calls on Mexico to Be “Very, Very Angry” With U.S.

    DC Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton

    In a recent meeting of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) told Lanny Breuer, Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division within the Justice Department, that it was “extremely embarrassing that Mexico has been as kind to us.” According to Delegate Norton, the U.S. bears primary responsibility for the armed lawlessness of Mexico’s drug cartels. From the Mexican perspective, Delegate Norton argued the U.S. is “essentially shipping down arms to kill my people”.   If she were Mexican, she “would have been very, very angry at the Big Kahuna in the north.”

    Delegate Norton followed that claim with others, asserting that “nobody in the United States is doing very much to keep thugs from acquiring those guns in the first place,” and that Mr. Breuer “know[s] exactly where [the guns] came from.” Breuer did offer a defense of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, asserting that they “are doing an extraordinary job with their resources,” but he largely agreed with her charge that Mexico’s gun problem derives from the U.S. Indeed, in response to a question from Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL), Breuer stated that “It’s inescapable that a very large percentage of the guns that are in Mexico today do in fact come from the United States.”

    The Government Accounting Office disagrees. On June 19, Jess T. Ford, Director of International Affairs and Trade, testified before the House Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere. Mr. Ford stated that “[it] is impossible to know how many firearms are illegally trafficked into Mexico in a given year.” Of the weapons that have been seized and traced in Mexico over the past five years, the GAO reports that approximately 87% originated in the U.S. That is the basis for the “90 percent” figure quoted by Rep. Quigley.

    But this number does not mean what Rep. Quigley appears to believe it does. It says nothing about what percentage of guns seized in Mexico actually originated in the U.S., because not all seized guns are traced. The number only shows that Mexican authorities have over the past five years been 87% accurate in their preliminary assessment that a seized weapon may have originated in the U.S. and should be traced through the U.S.’s eTrace system.

    And it also says nothing about what percentage of guns in Mexico originated in the U.S. because, as Mr. Ford stated, no one knows how many guns enter Mexico illegally. Figures like “90 percent” sound impressive, but actual numbers are more illustrative and a good deal less intimidating: the number of guns seized in all of Mexico that have been traced back to the U.S., according to the GAO, has ranged from 1,950 in 2006 to 6,700 in 2008.

    There are three disconcerting things about this hearing. First, no one involved in the Committee – either witnesses or questioners – appears to have been fully acquainted with the government’s own report on the subject, which directly contradicts their entire interchange. Second, the Committee is drawing on these misconceptions to stir up enmity and anger between the U.S. and Mexico, to accuse the U.S. of facilitating arms trafficking, and to blame the U.S. for Mexico’s cartels. This does no service to U.S. authorities, to vital U.S.-Mexican cooperation, to the reputation of the U.S., or to the facts.

    And third, the Committee is giving further credence to the phony “90 percent” statistic, which is part of the public campaign for the “Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.” President Obama has backed the Convention as part of his public outreach to Mexico, but it is a seriously flawed treaty that poses considerable risks to the freedoms of Americans and those of foreign nationals residing in the U.S. The fact that its cause is being advanced by means such as the Committee’s hearing is yet one more strike against it.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Delegate Norton Calls on Mexico to Be “Very, Very Angry” With U.S.

    1. Tom, WI says:

      It is sad that many in congress are more interested in posturing than truth.

    2. Andrew, Michigan says:

      I fear 2 things with this article,

      1. A direct challenge to the second amendment of our right to bear arms. It is a diversional attack with the same core. A pretty popular book implies that it is not the temptation but how one acts upon that temptation that needs the attention. Translated in this context that it is not the guns, ammunition etc… but the individual that has and/or desires them. This is where the focus needs to be diverted to!

      2. Liberals trying to make a stink between Mexico and the U.S.A to cloud/mask an alternative agendas of which there are many (unions, amnesty, welfare, border patrol etc…) In this context we should peacefully make Mexico the 51st State of the Union as it solves many of these party line debates/issues. Law can be established, sanitization efforts for water and many American consumed crops, and my favorite, Freedoms and responsibilities for Mexicans that they currently do not realize thus elevating the condition of Mankind.

    3. Pingback: Mind the Gaps: Loose Lips Daily - City Desk - Washington City Paper

    4. Pingback: Delegate Norton Calls on Mexico to Be “Very, Very Angry” With U.S. « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.