Comments on: California’s Global Warming Policy is Not One to Follow http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/14/california%e2%80%99s-global-warming-policy-is-not-one-to-follow/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:06:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: California Voting Guide « Reason Riot http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/14/california%e2%80%99s-global-warming-policy-is-not-one-to-follow/#comment-224862 California Voting Guide « Reason Riot Sun, 17 Oct 2010 05:31:51 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=10690#comment-224862 [...] numbers about AB 32′s current and coming impact speak for themselves: …when the program is fully implemented, the average annual loss in gross state output from [...] [...] numbers about AB 32′s current and coming impact speak for themselves: …when the program is fully implemented, the average annual loss in gross state output from [...]

]]> By: Cooler Heads Digest 17 July 2009 | GlobalWarming.org http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/14/california%e2%80%99s-global-warming-policy-is-not-one-to-follow/#comment-43091 Cooler Heads Digest 17 July 2009 | GlobalWarming.org Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:57:32 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=10690#comment-43091 [...] California’s Global Warming Policy Is Not One To Follow Nick Loris, The Foundry, 14 July 2009 [...] [...] California’s Global Warming Policy Is Not One To Follow Nick Loris, The Foundry, 14 July 2009 [...]

]]> By: Aaron Huertas http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/14/california%e2%80%99s-global-warming-policy-is-not-one-to-follow/#comment-42227 Aaron Huertas Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:08:58 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=10690#comment-42227 The study has some major flaws, including a failure to account for any savings from more efficient electricity and fuel use. It focuses on $25 billion in costs, but ignores $40 billion in savings. Several economists have issued a statement pointing this out: <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/economic-climate-experts-debunk-misleading-report-costs-ab" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/economic-climate...</a>. This is another climate solution opposition study that is based on fundamentally flawed assumptions and errors of omission. Sincerely, Aaron Huertas Union of Concerned Scientists 202-331-5458 ahuertas@ucsusa.org The study has some major flaws, including a failure to account for any savings from more efficient electricity and fuel use. It focuses on $25 billion in costs, but ignores $40 billion in savings.

Several economists have issued a statement pointing this out: http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/economic-climate….

This is another climate solution opposition study that is based on fundamentally flawed assumptions and errors of omission.

Sincerely,

Aaron Huertas

Union of Concerned Scientists

202-331-5458

ahuertas@ucsusa.org

]]> By: California’s Global Warming Policy is Not One to Follow « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/14/california%e2%80%99s-global-warming-policy-is-not-one-to-follow/#comment-42162 California’s Global Warming Policy is Not One to Follow « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:36:35 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=10690#comment-42162 [...] California’s Global Warming Policy is Not One to Follow Posted in Heritage.com by nhiemstra on July 14, 2009 via: Heritage [...] [...] California’s Global Warming Policy is Not One to Follow Posted in Heritage.com by nhiemstra on July 14, 2009 via: Heritage [...]

]]>