<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Committee Blocks Anti-Rationing Amendments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ange Lobue, MD, MPH,</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-65432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ange Lobue, MD, MPH,</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-65432</guid>
		<description>National Security and Compassion 
 
Anyone who knows anything about statistics, especially public opinion polls knows that there are many factors, visible and hidden, which affect the results, not the least of which is their intended use.  Just compare Rasmussen Reports with those produced by pollsters affiliated with MoveOn.com. 
 
We would like to avoid the usual distracting focus on the popularity of the measures which is, either overtly or subtly, based upon a cost/benefit analysis in the mind of the observer, an analysis not unlike that which is applied to the costs of maintaining national security. 
 
The maintenance of each citizen&#039;s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the reason for the maintenance of our national security.  And the omission of the right to HEALTH in the Constitution, implies that health is a privilege, rather than a right, and has permitted an every-man-for-himself, profit-driven approach to health care that has been responsible for much unnecessary suffering and death in this country. 
 
We believe America can and should do better than that and should demonstrate its concern for the health of its citizens as the honorable and necessary thing to do, just as maintaining its national security is the honorable and necessary thing to do. 
 
We hope you will agree with us on this so that a meaningful conversation can begin about what really is important. 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
Ange Lobue, MD, MPH, BSPharm 
  American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology 
  Academy of Television Arts and Sciences 
Chantal Lobue, FNP, PAC, RN, BSN 
  Academy of Family Nurse Practitioners 
  Stanford University School of Medicine 
  Primary Care Associate Program 
  McKinleyville Family Practice 
 
trinidadca@gmail.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Security and Compassion</p>
<p>Anyone who knows anything about statistics, especially public opinion polls knows that there are many factors, visible and hidden, which affect the results, not the least of which is their intended use.  Just compare Rasmussen Reports with those produced by pollsters affiliated with MoveOn.com.</p>
<p>We would like to avoid the usual distracting focus on the popularity of the measures which is, either overtly or subtly, based upon a cost/benefit analysis in the mind of the observer, an analysis not unlike that which is applied to the costs of maintaining national security.</p>
<p>The maintenance of each citizen&#039;s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the reason for the maintenance of our national security.  And the omission of the right to HEALTH in the Constitution, implies that health is a privilege, rather than a right, and has permitted an every-man-for-himself, profit-driven approach to health care that has been responsible for much unnecessary suffering and death in this country.</p>
<p>We believe America can and should do better than that and should demonstrate its concern for the health of its citizens as the honorable and necessary thing to do, just as maintaining its national security is the honorable and necessary thing to do.</p>
<p>We hope you will agree with us on this so that a meaningful conversation can begin about what really is important.</p>
<p>Respectfully submitted,</p>
<p>Ange Lobue, MD, MPH, BSPharm</p>
<p>  American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology</p>
<p>  Academy of Television Arts and Sciences</p>
<p>Chantal Lobue, FNP, PAC, RN, BSN</p>
<p>  Academy of Family Nurse Practitioners</p>
<p>  Stanford University School of Medicine</p>
<p>  Primary Care Associate Program</p>
<p>  McKinleyville Family Practice</p>
<p><a href="mailto:trinidadca@gmail.com">trinidadca@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DF, Orlando</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-54554</link>
		<dc:creator>DF, Orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-54554</guid>
		<description>Ange Lobue and Chantal Madeleine Lobue are completely wrong. Rasmussen Reports August 10, 2009 that only 32% of Americans Support a Single-Payer System. 57% are completely against such system. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ange Lobue and Chantal Madeleine Lobue are completely wrong. Rasmussen Reports August 10, 2009 that only 32% of Americans Support a Single-Payer System. 57% are completely against such system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox News viewers overwhelmingly misinformed about health care reform proposals. - Page 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-50511</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox News viewers overwhelmingly misinformed about health care reform proposals. - Page 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-50511</guid>
		<description>[...] those FOX viewers really are incredibly stupid for thinking these things!  Rationing care: Senate Committee Blocks Anti-Rationing Amendments The Foundry Amendments designed to prevent this were rejected. Nearly every country with government run [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those FOX viewers really are incredibly stupid for thinking these things!  Rationing care: Senate Committee Blocks Anti-Rationing Amendments The Foundry Amendments designed to prevent this were rejected. Nearly every country with government run [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eight (NINE) Questions to Ask at a Townhall Meeting About ObamaCare &#171; The IUSB Vision Weblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-47504</link>
		<dc:creator>Eight (NINE) Questions to Ask at a Townhall Meeting About ObamaCare &#171; The IUSB Vision Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-47504</guid>
		<description>[...] Can you promise that government bureaucrats will not ration health care for patients on the public plan? President Obama promised on July 22 that health care reform would keep the government out of health care decisions, but both the House and Senate bills call for an increased role of comparative effectiveness research (CER). More information on health care effectiveness is good, as long as doctors and patients are the ones empowered to use that information. Conservatives in both the House and Senate offered amendments prohibiting the use of CER by government to mandate, deny, or ration care. These anti-rationing amendments were defeated in both the House and Senate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Can you promise that government bureaucrats will not ration health care for patients on the public plan? President Obama promised on July 22 that health care reform would keep the government out of health care decisions, but both the House and Senate bills call for an increased role of comparative effectiveness research (CER). More information on health care effectiveness is good, as long as doctors and patients are the ones empowered to use that information. Conservatives in both the House and Senate offered amendments prohibiting the use of CER by government to mandate, deny, or ration care. These anti-rationing amendments were defeated in both the House and Senate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken, AL</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-47398</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken, AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-47398</guid>
		<description>Please, no more government control. Tne government has gotten control of the Banks, The Auto Industry and now they want control of the Health Care Industry. More government control erodes freedom. Do you really trust a bunch of partisan idealogues to take care of you? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, no more government control. Tne government has gotten control of the Banks, The Auto Industry and now they want control of the Health Care Industry. More government control erodes freedom. Do you really trust a bunch of partisan idealogues to take care of you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberally Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obamacare Promises and Healthcare Lies</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-46407</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberally Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obamacare Promises and Healthcare Lies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-46407</guid>
		<description>[...] Barack Hussein Obama promised on July 22 that health care reform would keep the government out of health care decisions, but both the House and Senate bills call for an increased role of comparative effectiveness research (CER). More information on health care effectiveness is good as long as doctor’s and patients are the ones empowered to use that information. Conservatives in both the House and Senate offered amendments prohibiting the use of CER by government to mandate, deny, or ration care. These anti-rationing amendments were defeated in both the House and Senate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barack Hussein Obama promised on July 22 that health care reform would keep the government out of health care decisions, but both the House and Senate bills call for an increased role of comparative effectiveness research (CER). More information on health care effectiveness is good as long as doctor’s and patients are the ones empowered to use that information. Conservatives in both the House and Senate offered amendments prohibiting the use of CER by government to mandate, deny, or ration care. These anti-rationing amendments were defeated in both the House and Senate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Headlines &#171; NWI Patriots Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-45838</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Headlines &#171; NWI Patriots Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-45838</guid>
		<description>[...] Senate Committee Blocks Anti-Rationing Amendments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senate Committee Blocks Anti-Rationing Amendments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washoe County Republican Party &#187; Obamacare’s Effect on Seniors</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-45718</link>
		<dc:creator>Washoe County Republican Party &#187; Obamacare’s Effect on Seniors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-45718</guid>
		<description>[...] have given Obamacare supporters every opportunity to disavow government-rationed health care, but Obamacare supporters have voted down every anti-rationing amendment proposed. Make no mistake, Obama plans to pay for expanded coverage for the young and healthy by denying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have given Obamacare supporters every opportunity to disavow government-rationed health care, but Obamacare supporters have voted down every anti-rationing amendment proposed. Make no mistake, Obama plans to pay for expanded coverage for the young and healthy by denying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiObamaBlog.com &#187; Obamacare&#8217;s New Goal &#38; Effect On Seniors</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-44989</link>
		<dc:creator>AntiObamaBlog.com &#187; Obamacare&#8217;s New Goal &#38; Effect On Seniors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-44989</guid>
		<description>[...] have given Obamacare supporters every opportunity to disavow government-rationed health care, but Obamacare supporters have voted down every anti-rationing amendment proposed. Make no mistake, Obama plans to pay for expanded coverage for the young and healthy by denying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have given Obamacare supporters every opportunity to disavow government-rationed health care, but Obamacare supporters have voted down every anti-rationing amendment proposed. Make no mistake, Obama plans to pay for expanded coverage for the young and healthy by denying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fix Health Care Policy &#124; Obamacare&#8217;s Effect on Seniors</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/10/senate-committee-blocks-anti-rationing-amendments/#comment-44853</link>
		<dc:creator>Fix Health Care Policy &#124; Obamacare&#8217;s Effect on Seniors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=10460#comment-44853</guid>
		<description>[...] have given Obamacare supporters every opportunity to disavow government rationed health care, but Obamacare supporters have voted down every anti-rationing amendment proposed. Make no mistake, Obama plans to pay for expanded coverage for the young and healthy by denying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have given Obamacare supporters every opportunity to disavow government rationed health care, but Obamacare supporters have voted down every anti-rationing amendment proposed. Make no mistake, Obama plans to pay for expanded coverage for the young and healthy by denying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

