- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
NEA General Counsel: Union Dues, Not Education, Are Our Top Priority
Posted By Conn Carroll On July 9, 2009 @ 12:03 pm In Education,Enterprise and Free Markets | 39 Comments
General Counsel Bob Chanin explains to NEA convention why Big Labor is so powerful:
Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas; it is not because of the merit of our positions; it is not because we care about children; and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child.
The NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power. And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of million of dollars in dues each year because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them; the union that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.
This is not to say that the concern of NEA and its affiliates with closing achievement gaps, reducing drop rate rates, improving teacher quality, and the like are unimportant or inappropriate. To the contrary these are the goals that guide the work we do. But they need not and must not be achieved at the expense of due process, employee rights, or collective bargaining.
That is simply too high a price to pay.
Where to begin? First of all, there is little that is voluntary about the millions in dues paid to the NEA every year. The NEA is strongest in states without right to work laws, and if you want to teach in a public school that is under an NEA contract in those jurisdictions (like California and New York), you must pay dues to the NEA. It is the law. There is nothing voluntary about it. Second, that is tax payer money he’s talking about, which is exactly what is so corrupting about public sector unions: the government is lobbying itself for its own expansion.
And what are “employee rights” and “due process,” you might ask? Well, those are what require New York City to pay 700 union teachers $65 million a year to do nothing . Same thing in Los Angeles, where 165 union teachers collect a total of $10 million a year  from tax payers for doing nothing.
If you have the time, do watch the whole 25 minute address . Chanin recounts the rise of public sector collective bargaining, with a rapid rise in teacher unionization in the late 60s. He talks about all the victories the NEA has won for teachers since then. But ask yourselves, as the NEA has exploded in membership, budget, and power, how have American students fared? What have unions done for their education? Absolutely nothing. 
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/09/nea-general-counsel-union-dues-not-education-are-our-top-priority/
URLs in this post:
 New York City to pay 700 union teachers $65 million a year to do nothing: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090622/ap_on_re_us/us_rubber_rooms
 165 union teachers collect a total of $10 million a year: http://www.latimes.com/news/la-me-teachers6-2009may06,0,6604006.story?track=rss
 address: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqn1rvv7Fis
 Absolutely nothing.: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/bg2125.cfm
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.