• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A Reminder of the North Korea Missile Threat

    North Korea launched on July 2 at least three short-range anti-ship missiles into waters along its east coast. Pyongyang’s provocative act will further heighten tensions on the Korean Peninsula and may be a precursor to additional missile activity in coming days. Pyongyang’s increased anti-ship missile and coastal artillery training since the beginning of the year may be a show of tactical military prowess to back up escalating threats of renewed naval confrontation with South Korea over a disputed maritime border on the west coast.

    The launch of the anti-ship missiles, with a range of less than 100 miles, may not actually be a violation of UN resolutions which preclude “ballistic missile activity.” It is certainly no direct threat to the United States. But it is a pointed reminder – as it is not doubt intended – of the looming North Korean long range ballistic missile threat.

    Pyongyang’s continued development of nuclear weapons and ICBM delivery capability, in defiance of UN resolutions and international diplomatic pressure, demonstrates the need for the US and its allies to continue to develop and deploy missile defense systems, even as we do all we can both multilaterally and unilaterally to squeeze the regime into abandoning its programs.
    UN Resolution 1874 “demands that [North Korea] not conduct any further nuclear test or any launch using ballistic missile technology [and] decides that the DPRK shall suspend all activities related to its ballistic missile program.”

    Expectations for longer-range missile activity were heightened by reports in May that a long-range missile transporter was observed at two North Korean launch facilities, similar to observed preparations prior to Pyongyang’s April 5th launch of a Taepo Dong-2 missile which flew 2500 miles. It was conjectured that Pyongyang might choose to launch missiles either on the July 4th anniversary of the 2006 launch of a Taepo Dong-2 missile or the July 8th anniversary of the 1994 death of leader Kim Il-sung.

    However, US intelligence sources were quoted on July 1 as stating that there were no indications of an impending long-range launch. Even after a Taepo Dong missile is placed on the launch stand, it usually takes several days to fuel and prepare it. North Korea could instead choose to launch Scud short-range ballistic missiles or No Dong intermediate-range ballistic missiles with little preparation since they are mobile systems. The launch of either missile would be a clear violation of UN Resolution 1874.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to A Reminder of the North Korea Missile Threat

    1. Frank Vozenilek, Sr says:

      And due to the NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE AND CATASTROPHE OF THE DEATH OF, "SELF-PROCLAIMED POP KING," Michael Jackson . . .

      Not a word that I can remember hearing was mentioned about this TRULY internationally significant event. Having spent two tours in Korea assigned to US Army 2nd Infantry Division, I was EXTREMELY aware of Kim Jung Il's father, Kim Il Sung, being 'bout as nutty as a fruit cake. To the point of keeping us on some level of alert status at least weekly if not several times weekly. Now! We, the world, are dealing with his wacko kid!? And the news media determines to focus on a different Wacko!?

      Oh, brother! Where are the Huntleys, Brinkleys, Cronkites, Morrows and for goodness sakes, even the Clark Kents and Lois Lanes? At least they knew how to prioritize.

      Isn't it just a "Thriller" watching our news media professionals at work today . . . .

    2. cliffyworld says:

      The President needs to step up to the plate and reaffirm a strong, long-term US military commitment to its many allies in the region and not reply with weak rhetoric to a narcissistic dictator.

    3. Pingback: AntiObamaBlog.com » Obama Continues to Weaken National Defense

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×