With his style of speech, C-Span and the Senate floor will have to be X-rated, but he will fit right in with all of the other Democrat swindlers in congress.

With a filibuster-proof majority now, do you think they (The Crooks) will take advantage of the Republican minority?

In this case, Judge Sotomayor is a novelty because she's a woman and to top it off a woman of latin descent who has allegedly made prejudicial decisions, but it's definitely not unusual for judges to render unfair, unjust, and unobjective decisions and judgments in courts across the nations. That's why we have Motions for Reconsideration, Statements of Decision, and Appeals if you can afford it. If Judge Sotomayor hadn't made ethnicity an issue nor Obama made ethnicity and race an issue then it probably wouldn't have been a major news issue, but they did. And, La Raza is not a group in my opinion that any judge should be a member because they are politically active. Although, we'd like to believe that all judges are fair – reality is that all judges are just people with personal and private opinions. Judges have good and bad thoughts like everyone else, but their decisions affect every citizen as well as the way our country will lean – one wrong decision can cause the scales of justice to lean to the extreme left and it would be very difficult to make them right for many years to come.

I am just disgusted with the state of our country with no guiding principles represented in the Congress.

Obama is a dictator. He loves all the dictators around the globe. The military and the government officials in Hnduras are defending their constitution by enforcing the term limits. Obama felt very comfortable in meddling with that country and essentially took the sides of Chavez and Ortega.

Obama and Sotomayer are ideologically one and the same-anti-white and anti-American. It is amazing to see how many people follow him like the crowd did Rev.Jones a few decades ago.

When selecting an individual to interpret the highest law of the land, the Constitution, is compassion a quality which should either disqualify or make the person eligible for a supreme position of judgment?

A man named Alma once explained how mercy can appease the demands of justice, only through divine intervention, after the demands of justice have been met, and the individual has repented.

He asked, " How could there be a law save there was a punishment [justice]?…What, do ye suppose that mercy can rob justice? I say unto you, Nay; not one whit. If so, God would cease to be God."

The United States Supreme Court motto is simply stated: “ Equal Justice Under Law ”.

Justice looks objectively on facts, not feeling, facts which are tangible, not malleable, as are the thoughts associated with compassion and empathy.

Which one of us, when looking upon the total breadth of life experiences of any individual(s), criminal or victim, would not be sympathetic or merciful when viewing the effects of their hardships and the complexities of human nature upon their existence?

Passion creates prejudice, which endangers justice.

Compassion can indeed rob justice, and then my friends, what good is the law?