• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade’s Biggest Losers: Manufacturing


    We’re in one of the worst economic downturns our nation has ever faced, and policymakers have rightly expressed their concerns about losing more jobs. Fearing that we’re losing too many jobs overseas through trade pacts, 106 Members of Congress are seeking to revamp U.S. trade policy:

    Many Democrats on Capitol Hill, however, are unhappy about manufacturing job losses that they blame on trade pacts such as NAFTA and say they do not want to approve any more agreements without some safeguards.”

    So, politicians want to protect manufacturing jobs, yet they are hastily moving forward with a cap and trade bill that will deal a crushing blow to the U.S. manufacturing sector. The higher energy costs from cap and trade will kill economic activity and jobs. This is particularly true of manufacturing jobs.

    Just how bad will it be? Economists in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis estimate that manufacturing jobs will fall on average by 400,000. Peak year unemployment in the manufacturing sector alone rises by almost 1.4 million.

    Some will disappear completely. Others will go overseas to countries that choose not to implement a carbon reduction scheme, where the cost of production will be much cheaper. (Sidebar: This should not be an invitation to implement protectionist policies that further drive up the costs for consumers. It’s simply a very good reason not to move forward with cap and trade).

    Over time, the American economy has taken on many forms. Productivity gains shifted a once largely agrarian economy to manufacturing, but today most Americans work to provide goods and services. As a result, manufacturing employment in the U.S. necessarily shrunk but output was higher. Despite the decline, the manufacturing base in the U.S. is strong. Cap and trade could change that.

    While manufacturing employment was a necessary decline in years past as efficiency gains put labor and capital to more productive use, cap and trade would needlessly shrink the manufacturing industry. More people by the day are realizing cap and trade is an energy tax in disguise. Energy-intensive sectors (i.e. manufacturing) will experience the most severe consequences.

    The Heritage Foundation created a Manufacturing Vulnerability Index (MVI) to show which states would be hit hardest from cap and trade. It works like this: The percentage of employment based in manufacturing in each district was multiplied by the percentage of power generated by coal. The higher the MVI, the more vulnerable a particular area is to the economic harm imposed by a policy that limits CO2.


    Just a little regional disparity.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade’s Biggest Losers: Manufacturing

    1. Pingback: Shopfloor » Blog Archive » Heritage Foundation — Cap and Trade’s Biggest Losers: Manufacturing

    2. Pingback: PheistyBlog » Blog Archive » OPPOSE CAP AND TRADE!

    3. AntonioSosa says:

      We'll make sure to remember who is voting in favor of the abomination that is cap and trade. They'll have to answer to us for killing our businesses, taking away our jobs, and helping Obama enslave us with his Ponzy scheme.

    4. Pingback: Political Mavens » AMERICANS SAVING; GOVERNMENT SPENDING

    5. Pingback: Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade”s Biggest Losers: Manufacturing | Manufacturing Business Blog

    6. Mason McIntyre says:

      The worst thing about this bill is, if it passes, not only will there be a 25% increase in our energy prices and not only will there be an increase in unemployment, but manufacturing – which is the backbone of this country – will basically be sent to China and India….Please write AND call your state representatives and tell them to vote no to the Waxman-Markey bill (H.R. 2454)….


    7. Pingback: Cap and Trade Hits Manufacturing, Farming and Small Business | Conservative Principles Now

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.