The Heritage Foundation - Leadership for America

The Foundry

Space Program Deserves Full Funding

Like cyberspace, space remains a critical enabler of America’s military power. Whether for navigating Navy destroyers through narrow straits, or guiding smart bombs to their targets, the military relies heavily on a strong presence in space. For this reason, potential adversaries, according to Secretary Gates, are investing “in weapons geared to neutralize our advantages.” This is true of China’s military modernization, which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs has said is “very much focused” on the United States military.

A central effort to overcoming America’s vulnerabilities in space is an Air Force program known as Operationally Responsive Space (ORS). ORS seeks to transform the archaic way America builds satellites today through the use of miniaturized, mission-focused satellites that can be launched on demand and used to construct large constellations that are more difficult for adversaries to target.

During the House Armed Services Committee mark-up last week, an additional $23 million was added to the ORS budget, bringing total funding for the program to $132 million. Although this figure is still short of the $197 million that was budgeted for ORS this year, it is a positive sign that Congress recognizes the role ORS has to play. In an environment of increased budget pressures, ORS offers a promising path forward on space that can be both strategically beneficial and cost-effective. When the Senate marks-up its Defense Authorization bill this week, it should look to provide the entirety of the Air Force’s $103.4 million unfunded requirement for ORS.

  • Author: Eric Sayers
  • Interact: Sphere
  • Share This
  • Print This Post

5 Comments

June 24, 2009 Meg, USA writes:

I think it is vitally important that we not only fun space programs like the ORS, but also like the one taking place to the moon right now. It all plays into new technologies etc., that we will need and use in the future. Plus, being raised a ’space kid’ myself, I think it is cool that we’re going back to the moon and other places to learn more!!!

June 25, 2009 runner writes:

Um, funding for space “military defense” applications I can support. NASA and the GLOBAL WARMING LIE, I oppose.

June 25, 2009 Marshall Hill MI. writes:

Finnish what you start!by NO-Brainer!

June 25, 2009 Lynn B. DeSpain writes:

No brainer! Everything spent on the ,”Space Program” is spent in this Country and creates jobs in this Country, and taxes are paid in this Country! We might as well dominate Space because with Obama and his ilk in Wshington we sure are not dominating America!
Hozro

June 26, 2009 John Rosky Andover,Mn writes:

Yes we need this and we need the other 14 missiles that we have paid for the silos and will pay 75 million to cancel.The government is to protect us and with Obama that is lacking.

Leave a comment

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. Commenting is a privilege, not a right. Please keep it clean and stay on topic. Personal attacks and obscene language will not be tolerated. Essentially, don’t say anything you wouldn’t say to your mother at the dinner table.

Sign up for Morning Bell Email

Archives

Heritage Poll

Recent Visitors

Search The Blog