Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Deployment Proves Missile Defense Value

Posted June 19th, 2009 at 12:15pm in Protect America 2 Print This Post Print This Post

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates ordered the deployment of the Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) to defend Hawaii should a pending North Korean long-range missile launch pose a threat to the US. The mobile ground-based missile defense system would augment longer-range missile interceptors based in Alaska. The US has also deployed the sea-based X-Band Radar (SBX) from Pearl Harbor to increase detection and intercept capabilities. The Obama administration was criticized for not deploying the highly capable radar prior to North Korea’s April launch of a long-range Taepo Dong-2 (TD-2) missile.

Augmenting the defense of Hawaii is a proper and prudent response to the potential for another North Korean long-range missile test. International diplomatic pressure has failed to deter Pyongyang from engaging in a series of rapid-fire provocations since January. The TD-2 launch and a nuclear weapons test in May were both in violation of existing UN resolutions. The Obama administration should publicly declare that it would intercept any North Korean missile that is determined to be on a threatening trajectory toward Hawaii or other US territory. Despite the growing North Korean and Iranian missile threats to the United States, the Obama administration recently slashed $1.4 billion from the missile defense budget.

A North Korean missile launch is not imminent since no missile has been observed on a launch pad. However, a missile transport train was observed during the past month at two North Korean launch facilities, including a newly complete launch site on the west coast. Pyongyang could potentially launch two long-range missiles, either two TD-2 ICBMs or a TD-2 and a Musudan-1 intermediate range ballistic missile that has been deployed but not yet tested. It could also augment the long-range missile launches with a multiple Scud short-range and No Dong medium-range missile launches as it did in July 2006. North Korea may decide to launch either on the July 4 anniversary of its 2006 TD-2 launch or the July 8 anniversary of the 1994 death of President Kim Il-sung.

Despite media reports that North Korea will launch a missile “toward Hawaii,” Pyongyang has not announced a forthcoming missile launch, including any specified trajectory, nor threatened US territory with a missile. North Korea’s bombastic propaganda has focused on threats to augment its nuclear weapons inventory or to respond “mercilessly” to US or UN actions, including intercepting North Korean ships suspected to be carrying contraband cargo.

Tags:

2 Responses to “Deployment Proves Missile Defense Value”

  1. J.C. Hughes, Texas on at said:

    We need to coordinate our anti-missile tests with North Korea’s ballistic launch capabilities. The N. Koreans can be entertained watching their missiles take to the sky while the U.S. will enjoy a fireworks display over international waters. It’s a win win for all.

  2. Bob, Dayton Ohio on at said:

    I would also like to know where the Judge stands with repecy to deploying a missle defense system overseas, to protect not only our nation but the nations of our allies: specifically, defense systems in Europe to deal with a potential Russian threat, and in Asia and the Middle-East to deal with threats from nations such as North Korea and Iran.

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.