• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Guest Blogger: Congressman Mike Coffman (R-CO) on the War in Afghanistan

    Repeating the Mistakes From the Iraq War in Afghanistan

    Yesterday, early in the morning, the House Armed Services Committee finished its work on the Defense Authorization bill for 2010. The bill unfortunately falls short is several areas, including a slashing of our missile defense program and a failure to dedicate the resources necessary to prevail in Afghanistan.

    I recently took a trip to Iraq and Afghanistan. This was my first trip back to Iraq since having served with the United States Marine Corps in al Anbar province from August 2005 to March 2006. No doubt, I was deeply impressed with the progress that has been made in Iraq and I’m confident that we are now on our way to bringing our direct involvement in that country to a just conclusion. But I cannot say the same thing about Afghanistan. The Obama Administration appears to be repeating the mistakes from early in the Iraq War, with incremental increases and a failure to fully commit the resources necessary to win.

    Afghanistan has no history of effective governance, is physically a larger county than Iraq with a diverse population, and has a resurgent and determined enemy. Yet our projected troop strength in Afghanistan only comes to 68,000. This is far less than the commitment we made in Iraq during the 2007 surge when U.S. troops totaled 168,000. Equally troubling is the current plan’s increase in native Afghan security forces, both police and army, to only 216,000. This is far less than the 615,000 total that is currently serving in Iraq.

    We’ve made enough mistakes already in Afghanistan that have allowed the once-defeated enemy to reemerge and dominate whole provinces. It’s time we were honest with the American people about the true cost of what it will take to win this war.

    I recently questioned Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee last month about the projected resources dedicated to Afghanistan. Admiral Mullen answered that once we get into the mission, we will have an opportunity to reassess what we need.

    During consideration of the defense bill, I was able to include an amendment which offers support to our senior military commanders in Afghanistan in their efforts to ensure they have the troop levels and types of forces needed to achieve the goals laid out by the President’s strategy. The amendment will allow them to use outside analysis to help determine what resources are necessary to secure Afghanistan to the point where real political progress can be made, such as is finally being achieved in Iraq. I hope this outside analysis will allow the military to seek information not easily susceptible to top-down pressure from the white House.

    By not putting in the necessary resources to win in Afghanistan, we are continuing the same old policies of dragging out a war that has already gone on for too long and has cost too many lives.

    The views expressed by guest bloggers on the Foundry do not necessarily reflect the views of the Heritage Foundation.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Guest Blogger: Congressman Mike Coffman (R-CO) on the War in Afghanistan

    1. David E Aldridge, Da says:

      Seems we did this once in Veitnam too. Spent two tours there, never did think we were there to win.

      Tell the on-site military commander what end result you want, ask him/her(now) what they need to accomplish the mission and then get the hell out of their way and let them do the job. THIS IS A WAR!!! Nobody wants to fess up and say it!! Grant or Lee said it best" politicians make poor Generals". And they cost needless lives. Reading combatants their Miranda rights???

    2. Lynn B. DeSpain says:

      Same as Vietnam! The soldiers didn't lose the war in Vietnam, the Polititions did!


    3. Loretta , Colorado says:

      It is about time someone cared enough to speak up!

    4. Michael, Fort Myers, says:

      Stop politising the military. Wipe these terrorists away and do it with overwhleming force. The one problem I had was that Bush listened to the politicians, not the military, when it came to Iraq and what we needed at its start. Then we changed direction with the surge (and it was a change in strategy too, not just more troops) to correct our under-strength issue. Give the military what they need to do the job, get the press out of there and let the military succeed.

    5. Frank HIll says:

      Who is going to do the "outside analysis". I'm very skeptical of paid contractors second guessing our military. I'm sick and tired of paid mercenaries (Black Water) doing the work our brave armed forces are perfectly capable of doing. 21,000 more troops will be on the ground in Afghanistan by July. That is approx. the same as what went in to the "Surge" for Iraq. Isn't that a start?

    6. Michele Lancaster, S says:

      We need our Military at home to protect this country from it's sieve like borders, to help rebuild our eroding infrastructure and keep the moolah here. We need to stop "Policing" the world and mind our own damn business for a change, this government is neglecting and abusing its children! Didn't the Roman and British Empires spread themselves thin……Our Military deserves the best and all we've given them is the –it detail!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.