• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • What CBO Says About the Kennedy-Dodd Health Bill

    17 June 2009 - Washington, DC - Senators on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee begins mark-up consideration on the Kennedy Health Care bill. The bill which may cost over a trillion dollars is being debated by both sides of the Senate committee.

    In February 1994, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said that the Clinton health plan would add $74 billion to the deficit over the following six years. And that spelled the beginning of the end of the Clinton plan to have the federal government supervise the financing and delivery of health care.

    Yesterday, CBO – an officially nonpartisan office whose director is appointed by the Democratic Congressional leadership – released its “preliminary” score of the Kennedy-Dodd bill. If enacted, the proposal would increase the federal budget deficit by $1 trillion over the next ten years. Over the next six years, the increase is $352 billion – almost five times the figure for the Clinton plan.

    Déjà vu, anyone?

    Big price tag. Although the Kennedy-Dodd estimates were not final but instead based on draft legislative text (that did not include details, including some expensive components of the bill yet to come), the figures have left some in Congress shell-shocked, scrambling to alter their proposals to lower the price tag of their plans.

    CBO estimates the Kennedy-Dodd plan would result in a net decrease in the number of uninsured Americans of roughly 31% by 2015. But if it costs $1 trillion to extend coverage to them, how much will it cost to cover the remaining 62 percent or a projected 36 million people who will still be uninsured in 2019 under the Kennedy-Dodd plan?

    Losing Private Coverage. Under the Kennedy-Dodd proposal, CBO projects that although there would be a net decrease of 16 million uninsured, another 23 million Americans would be unable to keep the insurance they have now, even if they like it – 15 million would lose their employer-sponsored insurance and 8 million people would lose other forms of coverage.

    Poor Return on Investment. For all the money that the bill throws at the problem of the uninsured, there’s surprisingly little “bang for our buck.” By 2019, the increase in the deficit for each additional person covered would be more than double the cost of simply buying that person insurance on the individual market today.

    Unknown Costs. While the estimated net cost of the bill is $1 trillion, the increase in spending would, in fact, be higher – roughly $1.3 trillion. The reason for this difference is that as employers reduce their health benefit spending, employees will receive more of their compensation in the form of taxable wages and salaries. This increases tax revenues and offsets the cost of the proposal by $257 billion. Furthermore, the CBO estimate of the cost of the Kennedy-Dodd proposal does not include the costs of expanding Medicaid to all persons whose income is under 150% of the federal poverty level (which some estimates would put at roughly $900 billion over ten years). Nor does it account for other key provisions of the bill, such as the imposition of minimum benefit requirements by a Medical Advisory Council, the introduction of a new public plan, and the effects of including employers in the gateways or exchanges. The CBO estimate also excludes interest payments on additions to the national debt, which has to be considered as part of the true cost of the plan.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to What CBO Says About the Kennedy-Dodd Health Bill

    1. Mason Bane, NC says:

      Medicare and Medicaid cost 60 times their projected costs. I would estimate that the same is true of this plan. If it is the same as the programs passed under LBJ, it will cost 60 trillion over the next 10 years. Mark my words.

    2. mmcc says:

      I do not trust the government getting involed in out health care. What is the rush, why does this have to be decided now? The only reason I can see is because Obama and his cult want more federal control over our lives, we are not going to socialism, we are going to Fascism. Congress is not standing up for the people, what are the citizens to do to get there voice heard?

    3. Judy,IL says:

      We can flood their offices with phone calls and hand written letters opposing these bills. Write to your member of congress, state your case. Refer to a bill, cite its name and number. You can find bill numbers at house.gov and senate.gov.

      State your purpose and then support your position with factual information. Be sure to address them with their proper title and ask for a response, include your name and return address.

      You can write any member of any state, not just your own state. We need to band together and defeat this administration. We need to take back our nation.

      Judy

    4. HSR0601 says:

      I suppose some common sense and cool head can solve this cost problem.

      As we know, the public option currently being discussed is modeled after Massachusetts Plan, under which about 97% of all Massachusetts residents are now covered.

      According to the approach of CBO, its rate of the uninsured in Massachusetts should be far greater than the present one at the moment.

      Moreover, in case the strong public option, medical IT, increased efforts in prevention, and a broader array of cost-saving plans and beyond add to the Massachusetts Plan, the cost containment does not matter at all. And most importantly, the promising stem cell research is making its way.

      To date, private insurers have coexisted profitably with Medicare and Medicaid for many years.

      Basically, healthy society leads to better productivity and better performance.

    5. Frank Ansonia C says:

      This healthcare bill is for all the illegal aliens all(10 million) of them & growing everyday in this country. The system should not be changed at all to cover all illegals.

    6. Pingback: ObamaCare Health Care Plans Still Lead To Government-Run Health Care « A Conservative Wanderer

    7. Pingback: The Baucus Bait And Switch | Fix Health Care Policy

    8. Pingback: The Baucus Bait And Switch - Reboot The Republic

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×