Comments on: The Clean Water Restoration Act Means Troubled Waters For Property Owners

By: Compare and Contrast | 912

Compare and Contrast | 912 — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:19:53 +0000

[...] and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country. Heritage: “The Clean Water Restoration Act Means Troubled Waters For Property …“: “…The Waxman-Markey global warming bill is far and away the most worrisome [...]

By: Billsocal

Billsocal — Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:44:45 +0000

You can add the CLEAR Act, Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources Act to this. We lose control over the Great Lakes and our water off shore. This why Obama has banned drilling operation if the Gulf. Another bill to worry about is the Livable Communities Act (SB1619). Sen Dodd farewell screwing of the American public. The Clean Water Act also might explain why the BLM took livestock from a Rancher in Nye County, NV with no legal court order. The rancher had water rights under Nevada Law. What is going on.

By: The Democratic Manifesto…or was that the Communist Manifesto? | From The Pea Patch

Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:17:23 +0000

By: A Call to Arms: Defeating the Democratic Communist Agenda | Pure Spontaneity

Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:37:23 +0000

[...] and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country.Heritage: “The Clean Water Restoration Act Means Troubled Waters For Property Owners“: “…The Waxman-Markey global warming bill is far and away the most worrisome [...]

By: Obama’s ReMarxable State | Clarion Advisory

Obama’s ReMarxable State | Clarion Advisory — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:01:29 +0000

[...] and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country. Heritage: “The Clean Water Restoration Act Means Troubled Waters For Property Owners“: “…The Waxman-Markey global warming bill is far and away the most worrisome [...]

By: Jdub,

Jdub, — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:28:21 +0000

I am also questioning if the original poster has read the bill. It gives significant provisions to ranchers/farmers and similar land owners.

the original poster also conveniently leaves out the hundreds of Clean Water Act cases that have not been able to be resolved due to the ambiguity in the original Clean Water Act.

Should an industry not have to pay for the environmental externalities of creating their product? How does pollution affect our liberty? Sometimes I think the Heritage Foundation is more concerned with making sure corporations can turn a few extra dollars in profit than the actual liberty of America's citizens.

By: Clean Water Restoration Act Gains Detractors | watersanity

Clean Water Restoration Act Gains Detractors | watersanity — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:55:57 +0000

[...] Heritage Foundation calls the act “troubled waters for property [...]

By: One Way or Another, They’re Gonna Get Ya « Grand Rants

One Way or Another, They’re Gonna Get Ya « Grand Rants — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:54:44 +0000

[...] Heritage Foundation calls the act “troubled waters for property owners.” [T]he CWRA seeks to… make the statute more [...]

By: NH

NH — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:20:08 +0000

Once they can control who lives or dies, how much energy we use, and our food and water, they can impose totalitarian communism upon us…. as planned.

By: Annie ( Buying Prope

Annie ( Buying Prope — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:09:45 +0000

Excellent blog this foundry.org well done and I was really pleased to see : this it's just what I needed to know.

It's taken me literally 2 hours and 08 minutes of searching the web to find foundry.org (lol)

But seriously I am really interested in Commercial Property normally and so I shall be very pleased to become a regular visitor

See you soon