• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • China's Pornography and Politics Blocker May be Stolen

    Only in China….
    You may have already heard that manufacturers selling personal computers in the PRC will now be required by the Chinese government to install a software program called Green Dam to filter out pornography and sexually explicit material. As could have been easily predicted, a couple of days later, reports surfaced that the filter would also block out topics considered politically dangerous to the Communist Party.

    Now Solid Oak Software, a California company, is charging that China stole parts of its CyberSitter program after the company found pieces of the software in Green Dam.

    Combined with the lack of advanced warning to the business community that all companies install the censoring program and the Chinese supplier’s ties to the military, we are presented with a uniquely troubling situation. The Internet should be a way for Chinese people to express unfettered opinions of social and political events. However, with existing government censorship, companies removing politically sensitive sources from online search functions, sometimes voluntarily providing information then used to jail dissidents, and this current web-filtering effort, the freedom and opportunities provided by the Internet everywhere else are still a long way off in China. The use of stolen intellectual property certainly adds to the richness of the story. But it also helps illustrate that the common thread throughout China’s many shortcomings is a fundamental lack of the rule of law and government accountability.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to China's Pornography and Politics Blocker May be Stolen

    1. PDS, NC says:

      When it comes to the Chinese… all is fair game.

    2. Ozzy6900, CT says:

      How long will it be until President Obama tries the same thing in America?

    3. Spiritof76 says:

      I agree that Chinese government is oppressive in terms of personal liberty. Aren't we going in the same direction ourselves? Fairness doctrine, slanted press mostly subservient to the Obama Admininstration, nationalization of banks and businesses, abrogation of private property rights, etc. etc.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.