Comments on: Morning Bell: Sham Elections Expose Obama’s Iran Policy

By: The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran! « A Nation ADrift-Why?

The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran! « A Nation ADrift-Why? — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:50:45 +0000

[...] Green Movement which had successfully organized mass opposition demonstrations last year following Ahmadinejad’s fraudulent reelection. The government also slowed Internet service and shut down some social networking services to [...]

By: Morning Bell: The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:51:19 +0000

By: Len, Alexandria,KY

Len, Alexandria,KY — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:10:35 +0000

Obama’s loud Silence is truly a black eye for Freedom loving America!! Will he ver discover some ideology that actually portrays American Values or is he just bent on Breaking the Bank???

By: chris furlong, california

chris furlong, california — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:30:02 +0000

Obama will not take any significant action with Iran. He has already cut a deal with Ahmedinejad behind the scenes. This is an inflamatory statement for which I do not have supporting facts…but, if we still had real journalism in this country the facts would be revealed.

By: Steven Bergel, NY

Steven Bergel, NY — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:24:55 +0000

This corrupt Iranian dictator thrived under Bush, so there is plenty of failure to share by several administrations.

By: Chyatt

Chyatt — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:42:42 +0000

How stupid of American’s to think that Iran will ever resemble U.S. democracy. Or, maybe not.

By: Barely A Blog » Updated: Barack Gets Brownie Point On Iran

Barely A Blog » Updated: Barack Gets Brownie Point On Iran — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:26:58 +0000

[...] the Heritage Foundation comes THE ULTIMATE endorsement for the Obama stance: “President Obama has shown little [...]

By: Thomas, Anchorage, AK

Thomas, Anchorage, AK — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:24:43 +0000

Ken,

That is not a statement of blame. The sham election exposed President Obama’s policy on Iran as one that approaches indifference. He hasn’t railed against tyranny. He hasn’t screamed support for democracy. He has steered clear of anything resembling a position. He has encouraged debate. He has acknowledged “concern” about violence against dissidents. He wants to talk. None of this is concrete support for or condemnation of anything. President Obama has refused to take a stand against the regime, so the regime walked all over President Obama.

The election drove home the point that the mullahs and President Ahmadinejad have not been persuaded in any way by President Obama’s flimsy character.

By: Barb -mn

Barb -mn — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:56:52 +0000

I agree with everyone who commented on Ken Jarvis.

I disagree with anyone who thinks Muslims want a “better relationship with the West.”

By: Sham Elections Expose Obama’s Iran Policy « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:15:35 +0000

[...] Sham Elections Expose Obama’s Iran Policy Posted in Heritage.com by nhiemstra on June 16, 2009 via: Heritage [...]