• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • More of the Same from the Security Council Points to the Need for Missile Defense

    The draft resolution on North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs reportedly agreed to by the security council’s permanent five members, plus Japan and South Korea, is nothing new. In fact, it is full of references back to unenforced provisions of previous resolutions, particularly from October 2006. More than anything else, its weakness points to two things: The critical need for missile defense and China’s unhelpful role in addressing the problem of a nuclear North Korea.

    The draft resolution renews calls for the inspection of vessels that went unheeded the last time around; it does not demand inspections. It expands a list of banned arms exports to North Korea from a list that already included battle tanks, combat vehicles, artillery, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles to “all arms”. It makes an exception for “small arms and light weapons.” What else is left? The resolution similarly expands a ban on exports from North Korea- without exception. And it calls on, but doesn’t require, member states to impose expanded financial sanctions, to cover export credits, grants, assistance, and concessional loans. And it is all done under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the UN Charter, which excludes the use of force – a contentious issue in previous rounds of Security Council talks and a key problem with enforcing the October 2006 resolution.

    As is always the case, regardless of Administration, we will all now be told how big a deal this is. “Unprecedented” is already being rolled out. And most importantly from the Administration’s view, we will be told that China has stepped up to its responsibility. The Chinese will be rewarded for their weeks of interference on behalf of North Korea with literally years of praise for being “a responsible stakeholder.”

    But nothing has changed. The game is still about enforcement, and it’s about China’s unused bi-lateral leverage. We pretend in the Security Council like we all care and all have equal leverage. Actually, the Chinese have more influence over their North Korean allies than everyone else. Yet they still value stability and a perpetually divided peninsula over the threat of a Nuclear North Korea. A few days ago, former Deputy Secretary of State – not your average right wing “hardliner” – told a CNBC audience that he was convinced China will “accept” a nuclear North Korea. Chinese compromise at the Security Council on behalf of its client state in North Korea does nothing to prove him wrong. The Chinese and Russian prevented a tougher resolution, and will continue to prevent effective enforcement of this one. And that will be the problem. Like the others, it will be ignored.

    The civilized world gets the worst of both worlds in the end. Because, as happened after the missile test in April, even a half-hearted statement of condemnation will elicit a typically furious North Korean response.

    What has been happening at the United Nations over the last several weeks is about two things: China and the need for missile defense. It is about China because our diplomats appear to be more concerned with consensus in the Security Council than actually doing something that will really bite. They are certainly averse to forcing the Chinese to veto a tough resolution ,which would show more about Chinese objectives than anything else. It is about missiles more than North Korea, because no matter where the missiles are coming from, the United States needs a defense; its diplomatic efforts, however skillful, will not stop them.

    As if the list of demands in today’s draft resolution is not long enough, it calls on the North Koreans to join the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Maybe that’s their fallback. I prefer missile defense.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to More of the Same from the Security Council Points to the Need for Missile Defense

    1. Spiritof76, New Hamp says:

      The US is feckless especially with the apology-issuer Obama in the White House.

      The sad fact is that we need China more than they need us. All the so-called experts, even some posting here, have opined that China needs us more than we do. Those people are living in the la-la land.

      Chinese own over $1T of our debt. China enables the bankrupt US government to spend money it does not have. The Administration officials have all paraded in front of the Chinese to plead for their continued purchase of our debt. Clinton and Pelosi have deliberately set aside talking about human rights violations there. The tax cheat, Geithner went over there to assure the Chinese that we were not monetizing the debt which drew derisive laughter. The US under Obama has become a laughing stock.

      Chinese have no interest in checking their proxy, N.Korea so that they can keep the pressure on the US and its allies at no cost to them. In addition, the Chinese have their eyes on Taiwan. They will use some pretext to take over Taiwan while keeping the region unstable.

      The Chinese government is pouring money into their navy so that they will control the South China Sea. They are already harassing the US navy with impunity.

      The UN resolutions are meaningless exercises. N.Korea are supplying nuclear and missile technology to Iran.

      Obama administration is so clueless that they will abandon anti-missile defense system.

      What will Obama do if N.Korea attacks S.Korea while Taiwan gets gobbled up by the Chinese? This is not trick question. The obvious answer is Obama will wave the white flag and pull out of S.Korea.

    2. Greg Perlinski The V says:

      Received an Email today stating that Obama wants to sell plans for the B2 bomber to China for a 50 billion dollar reduction in debt. True or false?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.