• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Is An Automaker a "Financial Institution"? You Decide

    Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg

    Yesterday afternoon, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued an order delaying the sale of Chrysler’s assets to a new firm controlled by Fiat, in order to more fully consider claims by a group of Indiana pension funds that the process violated federal law. A key argument made by the Hoosier funds is that the federal government can’t use the Troubled Asset Relief Program, TARP, to bail out Chrysler (or General Motors for that matter). As explained here last December, the question comes down to whether a car maker is a “financial institution.” Chrysler and the federal government say yes, it is.

    Is the government right? You decide. Here’s how the TARP law defines “financial institution”:

    FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘‘financial institution’’ means any institution, including, but not limited to, any bank, savings association, credit union, security broker or dealer, or insurance company, established and regulated under the laws of the United States or any State, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, or the United States Virgin Islands, and having significant operations in the United States, but excluding any central bank of, or institution owned by, a foreign government.

    Chrysler and the government say the word “financial” doesn’t really mean anything, and the list of types of financial institutions is really just so much mumbo-jumbo. So they say, a “financial institution,” once the troublesome words are taken out, can be “any institution… established and regulated under the laws of the United States or any state…”

    It shouldn’t take a law degree to work this one out, just some common sense. Unfortunately, that’s something that’s in short supply in Washington, D.C.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Is An Automaker a "Financial Institution"? You Decide

    1. Eric, Florida says:

      How stupid are the American taxpayers when they bail out industries (financial or otherwise) that charge us that cost to pay that bailout back in the form of increases in service costs and fees, which goes back to Congress as a “pay back”, which plans to spend it again instead of retiring debt or cutting taxes. Nice new way to force a tax on the taxpayers.

    2. J.C. Hughes, Texas says:

      Heck! I'm a financial institution. Along with keeping some of my taxed earnings, I'll spend that and any bailout money to support the weakened economy. TARP in and of itself is a government interventionist farce. Although the spirit of Jame's question is understood, all it asks about is the color of leaves while overlooking an established root rot.

    3. Pingback: » Financial News Update - 06/09/09 NoisyRoom.net: “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the face of tyranny is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater

    4. mark elder, texarkan says:

      Too Frusterated!

      I am so angry yet numb from being so angry at the mafioso style of extortion that our federal government is partaking in under the leader ship of an illegal president and the statist run congress and senate. The whole while our government media turns a blind eye and deaf ear upon it all I am so angry that I am going to bed and pray that perhaps God will bring a fog across the river in order for us to escape this naked communist in the white house…And his demonic cohorts on capital hill and their minions in extra large crooked business and clollege acedemia. But Lord I pray for intervention this very night and that you shed your grace on America and future generations once again..

    5. Barb -mn says:

      As the president pushes for mandated college education?

      Continued indoctrination of dummying down and limiting thinking.

      The actions and words of the college educated running the country are an example. Limitless thinking people will get a much higher, efficient and effective education at a more reasonable cost through life’s experience.

      This is an example of law understood one way but can be suited to bias any way.

    6. Edite , Canada says:

      One has to be very concerned about the optics regarding the "new" clunker car" proposal for America. It sounds eerily reminiscent of the old Soviet clunker, LADA. Do we really want that?

    7. Pingback: Is An Automaker a “Financial Institution”? You Decide « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×