• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • INSTANT ANALYSIS: Supreme Court Delays Sale of Chrysler

    According to the Associated Press, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken the extremely rare step of issuing a stay on the sale of Chrysler to Fiat, after three Indiana state pension and construction funds petitioned for the delay pending an appeal of a lower court decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that the sale is “stayed pending further order.” The Obama administration had urged the court to reject the request.

    This is a reasonable delay to protect fundamental rights.

    • Time for consideration: Though the Court’s action to temporarily delay the sale of Chrysler to a government-funded shell corporation does not address the merits of the case, it does give the judicial process something it has not had up to this point: time to consider the case. At every step of the way until now, the courts have hastily passed on this case involving fundamental rights to give the government license to push through a sale that strains the seams of constitutionality and legality. That rush, in the face of serious legal issues, is unseemly, contrary to due process, and unbefitting “a nation of laws, not men.” This temporary delay is the first step toward any court actually considering the merits of the stay and the case.
    • Time to address the rule of law: Under the Second Circuit’s ruling, the government is free to seize private property to further its agenda. In effect, it left no limits to the federal government’s power under the TARP statute, because no party would have the ability to challenge any action that the government claims was related to the TARP. If the Supreme Court allows that ruling to stand, it will have a major impact on the economy and, in particular, on companies big enough to be bailed out by the government. Like so many of the Bush and Obama Administration’s economic interventions, this bailout could backfire by unsettling investors and raising the cost of capital to all businesses.
    • Reason for hope? But there is reason for optimism this afternoon. The stay issued by Justice Ginsburg is temporary, giving the Justices another day or two to consider whether to allow the case to go forward. Stays of this kind are rare, especially in non-capital cases. It indicates, at the least, that one or more justices are inclined to grant a longer stay. At this point, all bets are off; the Court could issue an order at any time either granting the stay or authorizing the sale of Chrysler.
    • The Constitution matters: Too often, the Supreme Court defers to the government on economic policy rather than enforce the Constitution’s limits on government powers. This is because only four Justices on the Court today adhere to the Constitution as it was originally written. The rest allow their personal preferences to influence their decisions, leading to an ever-larger and more powerful federal government. That’s why it is crucially important the President nominate judges who follow the law as it was written, not as they think it should be. Otherwise, there is no hope that the federal government will continue to respect the rights of its citizens and the limits of its own power.

    Click here for more on Bailouts, Abusive Bankruptcies, And the Rule of Law by Andrew M. Grossman

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    10 Responses to INSTANT ANALYSIS: Supreme Court Delays Sale of Chrysler

    1. JK, Currituck, NC says:

      The stealth reorganization of Chrysler, accomplished by White House cramdowns, challenges the Supreme Court to define whether "too big to fail" can morph into "too big to follow the law."

      The Supreme Court knocked down several of FDR's attempts at massive intervention in the private sector. He hit back by attempting to pack the Court. The rationale he gave for the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1937, in one particular, is stunningly on point with Obama's approach: private contractual rights must give way when the Prez says the economy demands it.

      Hello. The fireside chat excerpt and Chrylser and the New New Deal here – http://tinyurl.com/nsxaq5

    2. Anonymous Finch, U.S says:

      For the New Deal historians out there, this could be Obama's "sick chicken."


    3. Pingback: Ginsburg Stays the Chrysler Sale: Obama's Sick Chicken? | Obama Approval Rating Blog

    4. Pingback: » Financial News Update - 06/08/09 NoisyRoom.net: “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the face of tyranny is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater

    5. J.C. Hughes, Texas says:

      Redistribution of "the wealth" via TAXES and PRIVATE INVESTMENTS? Even Justice Ginsburg saw the manure underlying the demagogue's frosting. The administration and congressional leadership are completely out of control. Can we just crash and get it over with?

    6. Pingback: The Greenroom » Forum Archive » Slowing down the Obama juggernaut

    7. Scott, Florida says:

      So much for the stay. They can move forward that quickly. If this isn't a dictatorship in the making, what is?

      Contracts and rule of law mean nothing. I for one hope business pulls their money from this country and we simply crash. I will have to lick my wounds as well but that may be the only way Americans wake up. July 4th this year feels different.

    8. Pingback: Supreme Court Delays Sale of Chrysler « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    9. Pingback: The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » MORNING READ

    10. Pingback: Ginsburg Stays the Chrysler Sale: Obama’s Sick Chicken? « Commentary « Anonymous Finch

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.