<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming Conference:  Why all the Alarmism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntonioSosa</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/#comment-35529</link>
		<dc:creator>AntonioSosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=7631#comment-35529</guid>
		<description>Those brainwashed to the point of wanting to destroy the economy to &quot;prevent global warming&quot; are behaving like the most primitive human beings who were duped into believing that human sacrifices would ensure them good weather. Human beings don&#039;t have the power to control climate! We can&#8217;t even accurately predict the weather a month in advance! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those brainwashed to the point of wanting to destroy the economy to &quot;prevent global warming&quot; are behaving like the most primitive human beings who were duped into believing that human sacrifices would ensure them good weather. Human beings don&#039;t have the power to control climate! We can&rsquo;t even accurately predict the weather a month in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Beltz; Social</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/#comment-35307</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Beltz; Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=7631#comment-35307</guid>
		<description>Of all the studies I&#039;ve looked at, only one thing I can say for sure - there are people manipulating the facts; it has always been a downfall of human inquiry to support information that fits a particular belief system and the climate change debate is no different.  If you stay the course long enough you can recruit more people to your cause. In the end, this is and always will be a battle of ideologies about how we as a species should live... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the studies I&#039;ve looked at, only one thing I can say for sure &#8211; there are people manipulating the facts; it has always been a downfall of human inquiry to support information that fits a particular belief system and the climate change debate is no different.  If you stay the course long enough you can recruit more people to your cause. In the end, this is and always will be a battle of ideologies about how we as a species should live&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The denialfest so nice they held it twice? &#171; The Way Things Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/#comment-35123</link>
		<dc:creator>The denialfest so nice they held it twice? &#171; The Way Things Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=7631#comment-35123</guid>
		<description>[...] anyone tell me? There&#8217;s nothing in the news about it-  I had to find out browsing wingnut, antiregulation front group blogs. What could possibly be the impetus for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anyone tell me? There&#8217;s nothing in the news about it-  I had to find out browsing wingnut, antiregulation front group blogs. What could possibly be the impetus for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Global Warming news - Page 4 - theBubbler</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/#comment-35088</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Global Warming news - Page 4 - theBubbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=7631#comment-35088</guid>
		<description>[...] SCIENTISTS FABRICATE AND FALSIFY RESEARCH?  Evidence could turn climate legislation on its head  Global Warming Conference: Why all the Alarmism?     __________________ I don&#039;t need an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SCIENTISTS FABRICATE AND FALSIFY RESEARCH?  Evidence could turn climate legislation on its head  Global Warming Conference: Why all the Alarmism?     __________________ I don&#8217;t need an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Loris</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/#comment-35101</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Loris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=7631#comment-35101</guid>
		<description>Lelia,  
 
You may be right, I don&#039;t know. There are, however, a number of credible scientists here, so please check back for more updates.  
 
Nick </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lelia, </p>
<p>You may be right, I don&#039;t know. There are, however, a number of credible scientists here, so please check back for more updates. </p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rmoen, Reno, NV</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/#comment-35069</link>
		<dc:creator>Rmoen, Reno, NV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=7631#comment-35069</guid>
		<description>I am a Democrat who for the past 20 years believed global warming was caused by CO2.  But more and more it looks like is a natural phenomenon to me, possibly exacerbated by CO2. 
 
A year ago I launched &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.energyplanusa.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.energyplanusa.com&lt;/a&gt; where I try to bring common sense discussion to our country&#8217;s energy policy.  I set out to find the &#039;smoking gun&#039; that proves global warming is driven by CO2.  Instead, I found that the wellspring of man-made global warming theory, the UN&#8217;s IPCC reports on climate change, are compromised by politics and an agenda, and that man-made global warming theorists cherry pick facts and ignore contradictory evidence from reliable studies.  In short, there is no smoking gun yet the man-made crowd refuses to entertain other possibilities.  Yes, CO2 MAY contribute to global warming but to say it DRIVES global warming goes beyond science into the realm of agenda driven politics. 
 
Before the United States increases the cost of energy with a carbon tax or cap-and-trade, we need to establish a non-political commission to review the facts and evidence surrounding global warming.  The UN, a political organization, should not be determining American energy policy. The stakes are huge. If we respond to global warming incorrectly, our children and grandchildren will likely lead lives of increasing hardship and desperation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Democrat who for the past 20 years believed global warming was caused by CO2.  But more and more it looks like is a natural phenomenon to me, possibly exacerbated by CO2.</p>
<p>A year ago I launched <a href="http://www.energyplanusa.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.energyplanusa.com</a> where I try to bring common sense discussion to our country&rsquo;s energy policy.  I set out to find the &#039;smoking gun&#039; that proves global warming is driven by CO2.  Instead, I found that the wellspring of man-made global warming theory, the UN&rsquo;s IPCC reports on climate change, are compromised by politics and an agenda, and that man-made global warming theorists cherry pick facts and ignore contradictory evidence from reliable studies.  In short, there is no smoking gun yet the man-made crowd refuses to entertain other possibilities.  Yes, CO2 MAY contribute to global warming but to say it DRIVES global warming goes beyond science into the realm of agenda driven politics.</p>
<p>Before the United States increases the cost of energy with a carbon tax or cap-and-trade, we need to establish a non-political commission to review the facts and evidence surrounding global warming.  The UN, a political organization, should not be determining American energy policy. The stakes are huge. If we respond to global warming incorrectly, our children and grandchildren will likely lead lives of increasing hardship and desperation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lelia Thomas, Americ</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/02/global-warming-conference-why-all-the-alarmism/#comment-35037</link>
		<dc:creator>Lelia Thomas, Americ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=7631#comment-35037</guid>
		<description>As much as I think the warming period we are going through is not due to man, and is rather cyclical and within norms, I&#039;m not sure that Dr. Lindzen should be one to use as an argument against the alarmist theories. Indeed, it is ironic that Lindzen calls the IPCC results not credible, when he himself should be seriously questioned.  
 
Lindzen is known for being a naysayer and arguing against most all popular theories and discoveries. This man still says that smoking and secondhand smoke aren&#039;t a big deal. He is not a positive advocate for reason, I don&#039;t think. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I think the warming period we are going through is not due to man, and is rather cyclical and within norms, I&#039;m not sure that Dr. Lindzen should be one to use as an argument against the alarmist theories. Indeed, it is ironic that Lindzen calls the IPCC results not credible, when he himself should be seriously questioned. </p>
<p>Lindzen is known for being a naysayer and arguing against most all popular theories and discoveries. This man still says that smoking and secondhand smoke aren&#039;t a big deal. He is not a positive advocate for reason, I don&#039;t think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

