Comments on: Don’t Forget Sotomayor’s “Inherent Physiological or Cultural Differences”

By: FACTS: WHY VOTE AGAINST SOTOMAYOR « FactReal

FACTS: WHY VOTE AGAINST SOTOMAYOR « FactReal — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:13:53 +0000

[...] Don’t Forget Sotomayor’s “Inherent Physiological or Cultural Differences” [...]

By: The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » DAY’S END ROUNDUP

The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » DAY’S END ROUNDUP — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:08:13 +0000

[...] Justice Initiative’ – J. McCormack, Weekly Standard Assault on the status quo – dday, Hullabaloo ‘Inherent physiological or cultural differences’ – C. Carroll, Foundry Does the right need a Center for Amer. Progress? – TAPPED If only Cornyn had [...]

By: Marshall Hill MI.

Marshall Hill MI. — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:38:32 +0000

These are not just views,but Flaws in her character as a person who cannot make fair
and unbiased decisions!This is shown in her
past!She has no intent to Represent all of
America!

By: Naveen C. Gupta, NJ

Naveen C. Gupta, NJ — Sat, 30 May 2009 16:24:56 +0000

Any judge must judge on 1. Facts of the case as can be ascertained beyond any reasonable doubt 2.within the bounds of the constitution and, 3.within the bounds of law, in spite of , not because of , their own background, inclinations, or politics. If not then not. Past experience is important only to arrive at a conclusion with more speed. Delay can only be akin to denial. "Justice delayed is justice denied".

By: Ray, LA

Ray, LA — Sat, 30 May 2009 11:22:06 +0000

Much ado is being made by the government these days about how health care needs to be reformed. This nomination of Sotomayer is just the latest example that it is GOVERNMENT that is in need of reform – especially if she is confirmed. "REFORM GOVERNMENT NOW!" should be the rallying cry of conservatives during the 2010 election cycle, before it's too late – as pointed out by Tom from Iowa.

By: Jukka, MN

Jukka, MN — Fri, 29 May 2009 16:52:32 +0000

You're still under the illusion that we're living in a free nation, rather than an oligarchy controlled by Statists whose only goals are to take over total control of all wealth, decisions about your lives and power for the State and themselves. You’ll need to do much more than posting comments of websites to stop them. Otherwise, the alternative is to lose all your rights that PBO and his fellow travelers consider an affront to their goals of total domination and accept the crumbs they throw you, put on the padded blue jacket that looks like the rest and raise up your iPod loaded with all the speeches of PBO in the air chanting The One’s name like his other mind-numbed robots.

By: Al, The Villages, Fl

Al, The Villages, Fl — Fri, 29 May 2009 15:29:36 +0000

I don't see, at this point, anything that will stop this nomination. I thought I read somewhere that the committee does require at least one member of the opposition party in order to vote the nominee onto the floor. If that's the case, then the republicans could stop any nominee if they decide to do so. Seems to me there was an interview with then Sen Obama in which he lamented the fact that the interpretation of the constitution is such that it restricts the government from doing what it can and should do. Doesn't sound like these radical judges are out of step with his sentiments.

By: Angel, Ohio

Angel, Ohio — Fri, 29 May 2009 13:18:42 +0000

She will NOT uphold her oath of office. White, Black, Red, Yellow….. the law should be applied fairly and equally to ALL.

Here is the oath she will have to take:

"I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."

SO HELP YOU GOD — SONIA SOTOMAYER. Her word will mean nothing once she takes this oath because we will all know that she is lying.

By: Tom Iowa

Tom Iowa — Fri, 29 May 2009 13:11:44 +0000

The Second Amendment says ( A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free {STATE}, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.) Free STATE, not United States or District of Columbia as Sotomayor says. It was the States that implimented the Federal Government, not the other way around.

The States, we the people, should take the steps to restructure the Federal Government before it is to late.. 2010 is a good place to start..

By: SOOTHSAYER ONE

SOOTHSAYER ONE — Fri, 29 May 2009 13:05:07 +0000

SANDBAG

Sic Tacit Concentarie', this appointment would make four out of nine justices Roman Catholic; ergo, anti-abortion. A Supreme Court Justice communicates and risks excommunication with the Bishop of Rome. This nomination will be sandbagged by Chuck Schumer and Arlen Spector by orders from the George Soros Code Pink radical feminists.