• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Breaking News: Obama's Own TV Station Goes Easy On Obama

    There’s strange and then there’s this. ABC’s Jake Tapper writes:

    It’s perfectly fine, of course, for the White House to put out its own version of events — but is it right to do so by preventing actual reporters from covering something? (Even something like a pickup basketball game).

    Do Obama White House officials think their media coverage isn’t flattering enough?

    Is the goal to ultimately replace the pesky photographers who film what they want to and not what they’re told to (not to mention the annoying reporters who ask uncomfortable questions about, say, detainee policy and bank bailouts)?


    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Breaking News: Obama's Own TV Station Goes Easy On Obama

    1. TGR in HI says:

      What, the Drive-bys were not easy enough on the President?

    2. jr., Michigan says:

      and this suprises who?

    3. nikkis120@gmail.com says:

      I would like to thank all the kids and anyonelse who was involved in trying to help in the fight to find a cure for cancer, as a person who is ill and also has a loved one who is also suffering you can't know just how very much any and all help means, to know that people care about you at a time like this means more than I am able to say! God Bless You All!

    4. marcy pompano beach says:

      congrats to the young ladies but can't the white house do something positive on it's own?

    5. Barb -mn says:

      What these young ladies state to say and do is commendable.

      I understand the point of the blog is, Obama picking favorites, which I do not agree with but, since the video story struck a cord, I'd like to comment: periodically we hear some claim of discovery regarding cancer and yet the cancer rate seems to go up. Hitting me, not physically, but personally. Including the rate of non survivors, also personally. Where does the charitable contributions go? How much do the victims of cancer receive? (for whatever the name of the charity the majority of proceeds should go to the patient of that named charity or it shouldn't be allowed to be called a charity. The charity shouldn't be up to the victim to find but up to the charity to be known.) How much do those that volunteer get paid?? What are they doing at cost (itemize) to research cancer? How far have researchers come? What has research so far done to reduce cancer deaths?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.