• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Global Warming Regs Will Hand Our Children a Lower Standard of Living

    We’re mortgaging our children’s future. We’ve heard that phrase time and time again. President Obama used it just yesterday acknowledging that the U.S. debt load is “unsustainable”, saying, “We can’t keep on just borrowing from China. We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children’s future with more and more debt.”

    Proponents of cap and trade and any other global warming legislation are quick to argue that Americans’ short-sightedness is superseding the preservation of the planet for future generations.

    We’re doing it for our children. And our grandchildren. In fact, the idealism behind curbing global warming is causing policymakers to ignore the exorbitantly high costs. But if we’re saving the planet for future generations, the benefits must clearly outweigh those costs, right?

    Not right. Cap and trade would reduce global temperatures by a fraction of a degree.

    What is worse, cap and trade would actually increase the burden of debt on our children and grandchildren. The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis found that the Waxman-Markey bill would increase inflation-adjusted federal debt by 29 percent, or $33,400 additional federal debt per person, again after adjusting for inflation.

    Over the 2012-2035 timeline, the negative economic impacts accumulate, and the national debt is no exception. This is 29 percent increase is above what it would be without the legislation and represents an additional $33,400 per person, or more than $133,000 for a family of four. To reiterate, these burdens come after adjusting for inflation and are in addition to the $450,000 per family of federal debt that will accrue over this period even without cap and trade.
    debt-graph

    Cap and trade does more than mortgaging our children’s future. It’s condemning our children to a life less prosperous than ours. This debt reduces the rate of growth in potential economic output, thus putting future generations on a lower plane of economic well being than ours. Cap and trade will regress the United States to a lower standard of living so we can (maybe) reduce atmospheric carbon content by an almost immeasurably small amount.

    The reality is a slower pace of economic growth is the desired outcome. Capping carbon artificially pushes up the price of fossil fuels – our cheapest and most reliable source of energy. But just about everything we produce and do uses energy – some things much more than others. When faced with higher energy costs, businesses must make difficult decisions: leave the lights on or cut jobs. Typically to stay in business, they’ll choose the latter. Smaller businesses won’t be so lucky and will have to shut down.

    If we want a preview of what will happen under Waxman-Markey, take a look at today’s economy. Production and consumption are down, unemployment is up and, as a result, we’re using less energy and emitting less carbon. Waxman-Markey will only be worse, with an estimated 844,000 jobs lost on average and $7 trillion in lost gross domestic product over 2012-2035.

    A cap and trade plan is doing nothing but increasing that monthly payment for our children. By a lot. In an attempt to protect our children’s future, we’re doing just the opposite – all for a temperature change they’ll never notice in the first place. And in addition to more debt, we’re leaving them with a world with lower income, higher unemployment and higher energy costs.

    In truth, the only thing we’re protecting our children from is a better life.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to Global Warming Regs Will Hand Our Children a Lower Standard of Living

    1. Spiritof76, New Hamp says:

      What we need now is Gag and Remove the Congressional criminals ruining our country instead of Cap and Trade.

    2. Pingback: Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Global Warming Regs Will Hand Our Children a Lower Standard of Living

    3. enerwise, sc says:

      What must be changed here is the teaching that man made catastrophic global warming is a given.

      What is a given is the reason why politions refuse to stop teaching this lie.

    4. Barb -mn says:

      here's an observation. why does the government continue to import products that is banned from productivity here due to government claims of man-made global warming? And then charge us a carbon tax upon purchase and or usage(energy required?)

      please, someone put your foot down. stop this ugly scam.

    5. Barb -mn says:

      here's an observation: why does the government continue to import products that is banned from productivity here due to government claims of man-made global warming? And then charge us a carbon tax upon purchase and or usage(energy required?)

      please, someone put your foot down. stop this ugly scam.

    6. Pingback: PA Pundits - International

    7. Rob, Westfir, Oregon says:

      Soooo… What is the plan Mr. Obama? Raise energy prices via the "Cap & Trade" scheme/scam to further cripple our country? Great Idea! Ad this to the cost of borrowing TRILLIONS of $$$ and we are really screwed! It is past time for action, get everyone you know to scream at these clowns we have elected, We have had enough of this nonsense! Get out of the American Entrepenuers way and LET US GET AMERICA BACK ON TRACK! It is truly time for WE THE PEOPLE TO BE HEARD!

    8. Barb -mn says:

      What does "cap and trade" really mean when we're dealing with the 21st century MOB? THUG CULTURE!…

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×