Dangers of EFCA: Government Imposed Contracts
Posted May 15th, 2009 at 11.46am in Enterprise and Free Markets.
This video highlights a danger in the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) that could be worse then taking away the secret ballot. EFCA gives government officials the power to impose contracts on employees if an “acceptable” contract with the union is not negotiated within 90 days. According former Union Organizer Rian Wathen says:
If you put in the binding arbitration you remove any incentive for the union to be practical

May 15, 2009 Larry, in the Republic of TEXAS writes:
If I understand this ex-union man correctly, he BELIEVES that the incorporation of this binding arbitration would FORCE the unions to place unreasonable offers on the bargaining table, simply to start a fight that only lawyers win! So, what has really changed then? If they choose to walk off of a job, and are consequently banned from re-entering the premises of the abandoned work place, then criminal tresspassing charges and restraining orders should be filed with the Attorney General of the city having jurisdiction. Therefore if ANY attempt is made by them to harrass, block entry or picket that address they should rightfully be thrown in jail and charged! If all parties show good faith in resolving the differences it would never come to unreasonble offers or rejections. Enough said, next problem!