<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Cap and Trade Energy Tax Would Cost American Households</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smarry</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-42006</link>
		<dc:creator>Smarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-42006</guid>
		<description>In 2007, MIT did a study on the costs of cap and trade and found that cap and trade proposals that would reduce carbon emission by 50% to 80% below 1990 [...] 
___________________ 
Smarry 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.directstartv.com/jump.html?referID=oa-0-173189&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Get 28 movie channals for 3 months free&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2007, MIT did a study on the costs of cap and trade and found that cap and trade proposals that would reduce carbon emission by 50% to 80% below 1990 [...]</p>
<p>___________________</p>
<p>Smarry</p>
<p><a href="http://www.directstartv.com/jump.html?referID=oa-0-173189" rel="nofollow">Get 28 movie channals for 3 months free</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap and Trade Will Cost Every Family $3,900 Per Year &#124; reformingjournalism.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-39391</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap and Trade Will Cost Every Family $3,900 Per Year &#124; reformingjournalism.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-39391</guid>
		<description>[...] much for the early estimates on cap-and-trade legislation.  Turns out the figures will be much higher for every American household.  An MIT study puts the estimate at $800 per year in economic losses, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much for the early estimates on cap-and-trade legislation.  Turns out the figures will be much higher for every American household.  An MIT study puts the estimate at $800 per year in economic losses, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kalbach &#187; Spending Shock and Awe</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-35554</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kalbach &#187; Spending Shock and Awe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-35554</guid>
		<description>[...] nationalized health care and then jack up all our energy costs sky high with cap and trade. Which some estimates say would cost the average American family an insane $3900.00 a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nationalized health care and then jack up all our energy costs sky high with cap and trade. Which some estimates say would cost the average American family an insane $3900.00 a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beware Of Cap And Trade! &#171; A Conservative Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-33236</link>
		<dc:creator>Beware Of Cap And Trade! &#171; A Conservative Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-33236</guid>
		<description>[...] What Cap and Trade Energy Tax Would Cost American Households [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Cap and Trade Energy Tax Would Cost American Households [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotSheeple</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-32721</link>
		<dc:creator>NotSheeple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-32721</guid>
		<description>How is it that the Bureau of Labor Statistics managed, in 2007, to publish the dollar impact on the American family of 2009 legislation? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it that the Bureau of Labor Statistics managed, in 2007, to publish the dollar impact on the American family of 2009 legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Only 24% Know What Cap And Trade Is &#8212; Tax and Ration energy &#171; Tarpon&#8217;s Swamp</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-32022</link>
		<dc:creator>Only 24% Know What Cap And Trade Is &#8212; Tax and Ration energy &#171; Tarpon&#8217;s Swamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-32022</guid>
		<description>[...] In 2007, MIT did a study on the costs of cap and trade and found that cap and trade proposals that would reduce carbon emission by 50% to 80% below 1990 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In 2007, MIT did a study on the costs of cap and trade and found that cap and trade proposals that would reduce carbon emission by 50% to 80% below 1990 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conn Carroll</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-32030</link>
		<dc:creator>Conn Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-32030</guid>
		<description>Dear Conserve- 
The $3,900 cost is 100% correct. Click through on our link to the study and you&#039;ll see that Professor Reilly was trying to pull a fast one on the American people. His study clearly shows that cap and trade would cost American families $3,100 per year in new energy taxes. Now Reilly tries to claim these are not &quot;costs&quot; since the federal government will then get to spend the money, but if you believe that then why don&#039;t you just double the FICA withholding out of everyone of your paychecks? After all, accoring to Reilly, and I guess you to, it doesn&#039;t actually &quot;cost&quot; you anything. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Conserve-<br />
The $3,900 cost is 100% correct. Click through on our link to the study and you&#039;ll see that Professor Reilly was trying to pull a fast one on the American people. His study clearly shows that cap and trade would cost American families $3,100 per year in new energy taxes. Now Reilly tries to claim these are not &quot;costs&quot; since the federal government will then get to spend the money, but if you believe that then why don&#039;t you just double the FICA withholding out of everyone of your paychecks? After all, accoring to Reilly, and I guess you to, it doesn&#039;t actually &quot;cost&quot; you anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Fresno,CA write</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-32016</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Fresno,CA write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-32016</guid>
		<description>Dear Citizens across America, write your United States Senators and Representatives in the House and voice your opposition to &quot;cape and trade&quot; and every other illegal and immoral law that the Obama administration is trying to force upon us..  
  This is how we can begin to fight back, with thousands of letters and e-mails. And if this fails, we will then resort to Plan B. Stay tuned! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Citizens across America, write your United States Senators and Representatives in the House and voice your opposition to &quot;cape and trade&quot; and every other illegal and immoral law that the Obama administration is trying to force upon us.. </p>
<p>  This is how we can begin to fight back, with thousands of letters and e-mails. And if this fails, we will then resort to Plan B. Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. D. Norris</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-32012</link>
		<dc:creator>L. D. Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-32012</guid>
		<description>Global Warming - the biggest religious-type scam in human history, propagated by a clique of power-mad politicians and do-gooders.  The cost impact on us and our descendants will be immeasurably huge and without benefit.  Obama and his cohorts must be voted out of office at the earliest possible moment if our current free-enterprise economy is to continue to survive and prosper.  -                                  L. D. Norris </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global Warming &#8211; the biggest religious-type scam in human history, propagated by a clique of power-mad politicians and do-gooders.  The cost impact on us and our descendants will be immeasurably huge and without benefit.  Obama and his cohorts must be voted out of office at the earliest possible moment if our current free-enterprise economy is to continue to survive and prosper.  &#8211;                                  L. D. Norris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conserve, Vermont</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/what-a-cap-and-trade-energy-tax-will-cost-average-american-households/#comment-31982</link>
		<dc:creator>Conserve, Vermont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6490#comment-31982</guid>
		<description>I am very concerned about and against any new taxes.  But this quoted study and 3900 dollar cost have since been discredited by several people including MIT.  Newt looked like a idiot when he tried to refer to these numbers in the hearings last week.   
 
The truth about the plan, according to Professor John Reilly, one of the authors of the much misquoted and miscalculated cap-and-trade study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), is that the figures are inflated by a factor of ten. The real cost to Americans? More like $340, and that doesn&#8217;t even account for an emissions reduction threshold reached (or passed) by 2050, or the fact that all dollar calculations are made at today&#8217;s dollar value. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very concerned about and against any new taxes.  But this quoted study and 3900 dollar cost have since been discredited by several people including MIT.  Newt looked like a idiot when he tried to refer to these numbers in the hearings last week.  </p>
<p>The truth about the plan, according to Professor John Reilly, one of the authors of the much misquoted and miscalculated cap-and-trade study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), is that the figures are inflated by a factor of ten. The real cost to Americans? More like $340, and that doesn&rsquo;t even account for an emissions reduction threshold reached (or passed) by 2050, or the fact that all dollar calculations are made at today&rsquo;s dollar value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

