<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Waxman-Markey: Trillions in Economic Pain for No Environmental Gain</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/06/waxman-markey-%e2%80%93-trillions-in-economic-pain-for-no-environmental-gain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/06/waxman-markey-%e2%80%93-trillions-in-economic-pain-for-no-environmental-gain/</link> <description>The Foundry promotes conservative policies and principles by offering the best in public policy research with the day’s current events. The Foundry is published by The Heritage Foundation.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Analyzing the effects of Waxman-Markey @</title><link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/06/waxman-markey-%e2%80%93-trillions-in-economic-pain-for-no-environmental-gain/#comment-40847</link> <dc:creator>Analyzing the effects of Waxman-Markey @</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:02:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=6339#comment-40847</guid> <description>[...] Foundation analysis is here, and MasterSource, a free market energy site, is here.   Category: Economics, Energy, Global [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Foundation analysis is here, and MasterSource, a free market energy site, is here.   Category: Economics, Energy, Global [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PA Pundits - International</title><link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/06/waxman-markey-%e2%80%93-trillions-in-economic-pain-for-no-environmental-gain/#comment-31287</link> <dc:creator>PA Pundits - International</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:04:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=6339#comment-31287</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Waxman-Markey: Trillions In Economic Pain For No Environmental&#160;Gain...&lt;/strong&gt;Ben Lieberman.
TonyfromOz prefaces &#8230;..
The temperature increase quoted in this article differs slightly from the increase quoted in the earlier article, but the difference is insignificant, and only highlights the ridiculously small number that a...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Waxman-Markey: Trillions In Economic Pain For No Environmental&nbsp;Gain&#8230;</strong></p><p>Ben Lieberman.<br
/> TonyfromOz prefaces &#8230;..<br
/> The temperature increase quoted in this article differs slightly from the increase quoted in the earlier article, but the difference is insignificant, and only highlights the ridiculously small number that a&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marsha, Wheeling West Virginia</title><link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/06/waxman-markey-%e2%80%93-trillions-in-economic-pain-for-no-environmental-gain/#comment-31259</link> <dc:creator>Marsha, Wheeling West Virginia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:13:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=6339#comment-31259</guid> <description>Agree Waxman-Markley will result in very little environmental change with very high costs to the working American.  Man made global warming is a problematic issue and a ruse.  I wrote in a privious Waxman problem on this blog:Go learn earth sciences, weather sciences and chemistry (all three types).Those of us who do understand chemistry, weather and the earth sciences can tell you exactly how much man pollutes and how much a volcano pollutes through actual and empirical models. How much CO2 trees produce and how much oxygen they produce. Where does the majority of Oxygen come from? How is it recycled? I know and I will leave that for you to find out. As for empirical future models can&#039;t necessarily predict outcomes; all you would have to do is look at what is actually going on while not using empirical models (history is a good measure of the future). CO2 does not cause Global warming; I am sorry to say, as has been presented by the so many global warming kooks. I don’t call exhalation a pollution problem.Trees do pollute and pollute under the green idea.Learn how many carbon atoms verses oxygen atoms there are on earth and how much nitrogen man needs to live and the cycling of the all minerals and molecular structures, maybe you’ll learn something. I don’t have time to teach earth sciences in this short communication.One volcano eruption produces 800 years of so called green house gases in relation to what man produces. Are you saying exhalation and methane produced by man will destroy the earth? I guess the Dinosaurs methaned themselves out of existence as a green person might try and say.Learn how many volcanoes erupt each year how much green house gases go into the atmosphere and then learn how many green house gases are released from the magma through cracks and fissures each year. Figure out how to stop Volcanoes, cracks and fissures from releasing all that gas the life blood of the earth and the start of life on earth. When you figure out how to stop that; then stop it and then we will be dead. The greenies will have won. No life on earth.
Go to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean at the Galapagos Rift and watch the animals living in the hydrothermal vent area and surviving off that toxic environment at 380 degrees centigrade. They survive very well in the toxic waste (volcanic gases oops green house gases) produced by the magma.There is a British MP who says we need to get rid of a few people to reduce green house gases on earth? How sick if so.
I prefer to think about the mercury light bulbs which will be a problem in 5 to 10 years. The green outcry over iridescent light bulbs and use of CO2 was another ruse. I wonder if Representative Waxman and/or Representative Pelosi is profiting from the florescent light bulb craze. What disaster are they leading us into in the next 10 years with the bulb regulation?I feel sorry for anyone who falls for the Gore hype.  We will tax Americans to death while the rest of the world will laugh as we decline as a society.  It is time to wake up.It is our duty to stop the bad science and stop environmental regulations espcially from the likes of Waxman.  They begin with coal/oil elimination, then what comes next?  Stop human breathing?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree Waxman-Markley will result in very little environmental change with very high costs to the working American.  Man made global warming is a problematic issue and a ruse.  I wrote in a privious Waxman problem on this blog:</p><p>Go learn earth sciences, weather sciences and chemistry (all three types).</p><p>Those of us who do understand chemistry, weather and the earth sciences can tell you exactly how much man pollutes and how much a volcano pollutes through actual and empirical models. How much CO2 trees produce and how much oxygen they produce. Where does the majority of Oxygen come from? How is it recycled? I know and I will leave that for you to find out. As for empirical future models can&#8217;t necessarily predict outcomes; all you would have to do is look at what is actually going on while not using empirical models (history is a good measure of the future). CO2 does not cause Global warming; I am sorry to say, as has been presented by the so many global warming kooks. I don’t call exhalation a pollution problem.</p><p>Trees do pollute and pollute under the green idea.</p><p>Learn how many carbon atoms verses oxygen atoms there are on earth and how much nitrogen man needs to live and the cycling of the all minerals and molecular structures, maybe you’ll learn something. I don’t have time to teach earth sciences in this short communication.</p><p>One volcano eruption produces 800 years of so called green house gases in relation to what man produces. Are you saying exhalation and methane produced by man will destroy the earth? I guess the Dinosaurs methaned themselves out of existence as a green person might try and say.</p><p>Learn how many volcanoes erupt each year how much green house gases go into the atmosphere and then learn how many green house gases are released from the magma through cracks and fissures each year. Figure out how to stop Volcanoes, cracks and fissures from releasing all that gas the life blood of the earth and the start of life on earth. When you figure out how to stop that; then stop it and then we will be dead. The greenies will have won. No life on earth.</p><p>Go to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean at the Galapagos Rift and watch the animals living in the hydrothermal vent area and surviving off that toxic environment at 380 degrees centigrade. They survive very well in the toxic waste (volcanic gases oops green house gases) produced by the magma.</p><p>There is a British MP who says we need to get rid of a few people to reduce green house gases on earth? How sick if so.</p><p>I prefer to think about the mercury light bulbs which will be a problem in 5 to 10 years. The green outcry over iridescent light bulbs and use of CO2 was another ruse. I wonder if Representative Waxman and/or Representative Pelosi is profiting from the florescent light bulb craze. What disaster are they leading us into in the next 10 years with the bulb regulation?</p><p>I feel sorry for anyone who falls for the Gore hype.  We will tax Americans to death while the rest of the world will laugh as we decline as a society.  It is time to wake up.</p><p>It is our duty to stop the bad science and stop environmental regulations espcially from the likes of Waxman.  They begin with coal/oil elimination, then what comes next?  Stop human breathing?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barb -mn</title><link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/06/waxman-markey-%e2%80%93-trillions-in-economic-pain-for-no-environmental-gain/#comment-31235</link> <dc:creator>Barb -mn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:14:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=6339#comment-31235</guid> <description>Why are personal names attached? Let&#039;s debate these persons. What gives them governmental consideration? How are they living currently? What gives environmentalists governmental consideration? How does each and every person on the side of man-made global warming live? Including the MEDIA.Before imposing on the people, government should set the example at the least cost to taxpayers. If they operated the way they want to force us, expenses (our money) would be immediately reduced.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are personal names attached? Let&#8217;s debate these persons. What gives them governmental consideration? How are they living currently? What gives environmentalists governmental consideration? How does each and every person on the side of man-made global warming live? Including the MEDIA.</p><p>Before imposing on the people, government should set the example at the least cost to taxpayers. If they operated the way they want to force us, expenses (our money) would be immediately reduced.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/13 queries in 0.017 seconds using memcached

Served from: heritagewp1.siteworx.com @ 2010-03-22 03:16:13 -->