• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Russian Economy Dramatically Impacted by Economic Downturn

     Hundreds of Russians queue outside an office of a state-run employment company in central Moscow 25 November. Russian unemployment could be running at more than eight million, a government minister admitted earlier this month, though the official figure is much lower because millions of jobless have slipped through the social net. Hundreds of thousands of Russians are believed to have lost work during this year's financial crisis, the majority of them in Moscow.

    Unemployment is increasingly raising its profile in Russia’s crisis-hit economy. Last March it was at a record 40-percent high. The official data show that its level over the first quarter jumped from 6 to 7.5 million people, which is around 10 percent of Russia’s labor force. According to independent assessments, unemployment could well be even higher – 7.8-8.5 million.

    The authorities have responded to a sharp increase in the numbers of those laid off in a purely bureaucratic manner. If the government dislikes certain statistics, it only needs to suppress the actual picture. On the order from on high the Russian statistics agency (Rosstat) discontinued its monthly publication of unemployment data. Now, the statistics is to be made public once every quarter.

    Unemployment dynamics forecasts in Russia are pessimistic. Independent experts maintain unemployment will not stop rising, and its latent forms traditionally prevailing in Russia could well surface owing to the inevitable shrinking of both official and shadow economies.

    The other crisis characteristics are also small comfort. A 9.5 percent GDP slide in the first quarter has placed Russia in the top, but a hardly honorable, position among the G-20. Businesses have yet to feel the full effect of the government’s bailout package.

    Proposals to optimize Russia’s taxation system that the government is looking into envisage some tax cuts, particularly for small and medium business. But there is no guarantee the Finance and Economic Development Ministries’ proposals will get approved.

    As for its customs-tariff policy, the government is increasingly pursuing open protectionism. Russian commodities uncompetitive on domestic markets will be protected with raised import duties. They are to cover a wide range of hardware items, household chemicals, cars and foodstuffs. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has openly gloated recently that Russia’s non-accession to WTO yielded it certain benefits – Moscow does not need to reckon with WTO’s anti-protectionism measures.

    Moscow’s efforts to have a larger profile in governing the energy sphere internationally are also stalled. Conceptual Approach to the New Legal Framework for Energy Cooperation initiated by President Dmitry Medvedev has met with a cool reception from the West and especially from the European Union. Many westerners construed it as an ill-camouflaged policy to lobby the interests of Gazprom and other Russian energy majors.

    It looks like the document was as usual prepared in haste, and some of its items to be subject to international legal regulation aroused bewilderment. For example, it lists asphalt road coating, fuel timber and charcoal. This check-list seems to have been thoughtlessly borrowed from a directory of standard classification of foreign economic activity and is indicative of the Russian bureaucracy’s low professional standards and formalism.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Russian Economy Dramatically Impacted by Economic Downturn

    1. canada says:

      but, incredibly, for all its thuggishness and for its open hostility to small countries on its borders, the IMF is planning on giving the russians billions of dollars in loans.

      I'm willing to bet that the IMF – joke that it is – will be far more magnanimous to russia than it is to small african states that come to it pleading for hand-outs.

      this talk of a loan is absolutely infuriating

    2. canada says:


      i should have said "for all its open hostility," not just "for its open hostility," in the first line of my comment

      my bad

    3. Spiritof76, New Hamp says:

      I am not sure we have any great wisdom ourselves when we spend trillions by borrowing and printing, with debt and unfunded liability hovering around $70Trillion. We are not forming soup lines yet. But with rapid nationalization of every industry and banks, we will get there ourselves. Let us not mock Russia. Just look in the mirror. We are no longer the beacon of freedom ourselves!

    4. Andy, Chicago USA says:

      I hate when people compare apple and oranges and call them banana splits. US is far from Russia even if we go to the left for next decade we will still be far from what Russia is or wants to be. Why don't you go live in Russia for few years and experience life there first hand hmm. I did. Or comparing Al'quida/Taliban to WWII Natzie Germany. No it will take 1000 of years for Taliban to kill 40 million people that died during WWII. That is roughly 20,000 a day for next 6 years. No compression. More history and couple trips outside the country would do wonders. If you meet Irish in the bar it don't mean you know everything about Ireland. If you see Russia from your borders (i.e. Governor Palin) doesn't mean you become expert in foreign relationships.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.