• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • What Wasn’t Heard at the ‘Mobilization to End Poverty’

    Earlier this week about 1000 people came to DC for the “Mobilization to End Poverty” conference sponsored by the Christian organization Sojourners. It’s encouraging to see people of all ages come together from across the country out of common concern for the poor.
    Those gathered at the conference heard a lot of good material. They heard biblical teaching about poverty, injustice and the need to put their faith in action. They heard about the need for churches as well as government to play a role in advancing the common good. They heard the call to live out the words of Matthew 25 (“I was hungry and you gave me something to eat…I was sick and you looked after me”) and to take up the cause of the weak and vulnerable in the public square.

    Perhaps most striking, however, is what attendees did not hear emphasized at the conference.

    • They did not hear a coherent explanation of the different roles and responsibilities that churches and government should play in society. The implied message seemed to be: the more issues government takes on—and the more government spends on the poor—the better. There was little recognition that increased spending on government welfare programs might actually lower the amount churches give to the poor or crowd churches out of social welfare provision.
    • Attendees also did not hear the logical connection between certain Bible verses and public policies. It is one thing to quote Matthew 25 when making the case that Christians should care for the hurting. But it is quite a jump to go from these verses to advocating specific directions for foreign policy and national budget initiatives. Attendees were not given arguments that connected the dots between their good intensions and the policies they were urged to promote.
    • Finally, attendees did not hear much detail about the policies they were encouraged to lobby for, nor did they hear about the likely consequences of those policies. They were told to press their Senators and Congressmen to pass health care reform and budgets that reflect concern for the poor and the environment. They did not, however, hear much about the specific content of those budgets. Nor were they treated to an honest debate about the likely effects of proposed legislation concerning universal health care and carbon emissions regulation. There was no mention that, over the long run, these policies might actually do more harm than good to the poor.

    Mobilizing people to put their “faith in action for social justice” is a good thing to do. But when it comes to advocating for public policies, perhaps churches and the people they serve would benefit from an approach that dwells more on the details. The poor might then be able to say, “I have been the victim of unintended consequences, but you took the time to learn what works. I needed an advocate, and you pursued informed policy on my behalf.”

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to What Wasn’t Heard at the ‘Mobilization to End Poverty’

    1. J. Kalamazoo says:

      Invoking 'the common good' as a cause of action is the death knell of individual liberty. The common good is total result of actions by individual players, not a consensus of ideals to be acted upon.

    2. Jason, Missouri says:

      The point is continuing the conversation. A church crowded with those giving to the poor will not be crowded out by the government. I am conservative, and do not agree with many of the directives of Sojourners. Yet, I think we need to be part of the conversation. Right now progressives run the show, let's talk with them, not just too them.

    3. Gordon McCauley, Gle says:

      I know the courts don't see charity as a Church-State issue, but I do. The Constitution does not delegate charitable giving to the government, it is a private matter traditionally associated with Religious expression.

      I submit that the government is in direct competition with chruches and synagogues and is intentionally trying to put them out of business.

    4. John Hyland, Appleto says:

      It has always been that Churches and Charities provide the means for taking care of the poor and unfortunate. Not the Government. It is the Christian way! Take care of our own. Interestingly, Conservatives give twice the amounts to charities, Churches, food banks, half-way houses, shelters than liberals. The liberals always prefer to let government do it. If liberals would just give as much as Conservatives, perhaps no governmnet programs would be necessary except as a last resort and not the norm.

    5. Steven Fisher says:

      I guess it comes down to who you trust most with your money–your church and it's leaders, or the elcted politicians. I don't know about you, but that's a pretty easy decision for me.

    6. Pingback: The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » MORNING READ

    7. Rebecca in Tucson, A says:

      Bravo to: John Hyland, Appleton, WI!!** He has it exactly right. Something so true will curl the hair of those loud mouth liberals in Hollywood, who always think they do the good works! HA, it only takes 1 person, doing 1 thing for someone else to take care of most of our needs and the needy; if each of us will be that 1 person!! LESS GOVERNMENT, NOT MORE(!*~~) is what is always needed. Particularly now, when the party in charge can't get a proper handle on what's really important. Obahma's health plan scares me to death. I'm going to end up paying $$ and losing my benefits through Social Security Disability if this keeps up! WAKE UP, If it ain't broke, don't fix it. We already know, they'll walk on the backs of the poor to provide universal health insurance for the rich! It's the "Democratic" way. Problem is, America is a REPUBLIC! Best Wishes & Happy Landings from Tucson, AZ

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.