Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Questions for Secretary Napolitano: Real ID

Posted May 4th, 2009 at 11:27am in Protect America 2 Print This Post Print This Post

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano is tentatively scheduled to testify before the United States Senate Judiciary Committee about DHS immigration enforcement policies on May 6, 2009. Given Secretary Napolitano’s novel interpretations of federal law, the Heritage Foundation will be posting a series of questions (and suggested answers) for the Secretary. Past questions can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Does the Obama Administration support the implementation of the Real ID Act?

Congress has passed two bills that set Real ID standards for driver’s licenses in all U.S. jurisdictions. The Real ID legislation does not create a federal identification card, but it does set minimum security standards for driver’s licenses. All states have either agreed to comply with these standards or have applied for an extension of the deadline. Secure identification cards will make fraudulent documents more difficult to obtain and will also simplify employers’ efforts to check documents when verifying employer eligibility. Real ID is a sensible protection against identify fraud.

Congress is set to introduce legislation next week that could largely repeal the Real ID. The Administration should put pressure on Congress to ensure that this legislation does not effectively eliminate the Real ID standards.

For more Heritage research on Real ID, check out: The Heritage Foundation’s Research on Real ID.

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “Questions for Secretary Napolitano: Real ID”

  1. Marsha, Wheeling WV on at said:

    Real ID. A law with common sense values, otherwise congress would have not passed the law post 9/11.

    We have many laws that already deal with the individual and their legal Status.

    Why, Secretary Napolitano are you not enforcing the law(s)?

    You took an oath to uphold the constitution and protect the laws of the United States. Obviously you blur who is legal and not legal while dismissing Real ID which you have no right to do.

    Our concern has nothing to do with ethnicity. It has to do with your violation of the law which the American people have the right to receive legal compensation from your violation. You are a servant of the people not the other way around. It is time for the people to have our voices heard and for those who serve in Washington to realize that we the people have the power to remove you and the likes of you through constitutional means if you continue to violate the constitution, state and federal laws. Just because you are appointed to an office that really should not exist under the constitution you seem to feel you have a right to do your own thing; you are wrong. Real ID not only protects an individual’s identity it protects against someone using your identity to secure illegal employment. Rabble coming across the boarder North or South is not only a national security problem, a common sense problem and it is moronic stupidity for any government official to support.

    The Representative Republic does not give the Executive branch a right to violate the Seven Articles to the Constriction and Bill of Rights (first 10 amendments) and the subsequent amendments to the constitution. I don’t see anything in the 14th Amendment that gives the rabble the right to come into this country illegally which is a violation of laws both at the state and federal levels that are on the books.

    These individuals should not be allowed to stay in the United States. We do not want people who can not respect the laws of the land. If they violated a basic law that says you must apply for admittance to the U.S. then what else will they do illegally? Those who tell white lies have no morality against telling large lies. This is the same for those who are violating admittance laws.

  2. Marsha, Wheeling West Virginia on at said:

    Correction= Seven articles of the constitution and Bill of Rights.

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.