<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Supreme Court Vacancy: What’s at Stake, What’s Required</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/01/a-supreme-court-vacancy-what%e2%80%99s-at-stake-what%e2%80%99s-required/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/01/a-supreme-court-vacancy-what%e2%80%99s-at-stake-what%e2%80%99s-required/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hill&#8217;s Blog Briefing Room &#187; MIDDAY ROUNDUP</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/01/a-supreme-court-vacancy-what%e2%80%99s-at-stake-what%e2%80%99s-required/#comment-37738</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hill&#8217;s Blog Briefing Room &#187; MIDDAY ROUNDUP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6064#comment-37738</guid>
		<description>[...] Krauthammer on torture - Kevin Drum, Mother Jones Specter creates Dem logjam - Brian Beutler, TPMDC What&#039;s at stake with SCOTUS - Todd Gaziano, The Foundry Is Hannity chickening out? - Ali Frick, ThinkProgress Why Obama&#039;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Krauthammer on torture &#8211; Kevin Drum, Mother Jones Specter creates Dem logjam &#8211; Brian Beutler, TPMDC What&#8217;s at stake with SCOTUS &#8211; Todd Gaziano, The Foundry Is Hannity chickening out? &#8211; Ali Frick, ThinkProgress Why Obama&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale MN</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/01/a-supreme-court-vacancy-what%e2%80%99s-at-stake-what%e2%80%99s-required/#comment-30613</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6064#comment-30613</guid>
		<description>Those words used by the Pres. are very very against the Constitution and Law of America. When he admits right out that the Justice he will appoint change the laws as they see fit and how they feel about the case in front of them. &quot;Empathy of understanding and identifying what people&#8217;s hopes and struggles are&quot; does not belong in the court room when in America we base innocent or guilty on evidence, NOT feelings and empathy of the Judge. 
 
Will some one please explain to Obama that the laws are what we go by in the JUSTICE SYSTEM and he appoints &quot;someone who understands justice and isn&#8217;t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book&quot; he will be making a self admitted UNCONSTITUTIONAL decision based on personal feelings. Undermining our Judicial System with someone appointed for reasons other then what the Constitution and OATH they take stands for is nothing other then TREASON. I am so tired of this daily bold and belligerent OFFICIAL activity by the President, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Frank, and to many to mention it makes me sick to my stomach that the people that understand how we can make this stop with protections put in place to end the lunacy. 
 
WILL ANY ONE PLEASE START THE BALL OF AMERICAN JUSTICE ROLLING. I know the solid patriotic, law bidding, hard working, honest and a Constitution, bible, gun hugging loyal American Citizen knows what is right for our country.  
 
Our congress must watch this and other actions that will affect the next election and many to follow. It takes longer to fix something then to break it but it will always be fixed. Only the damage done during is unrecoverable. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those words used by the Pres. are very very against the Constitution and Law of America. When he admits right out that the Justice he will appoint change the laws as they see fit and how they feel about the case in front of them. &quot;Empathy of understanding and identifying what people&rsquo;s hopes and struggles are&quot; does not belong in the court room when in America we base innocent or guilty on evidence, NOT feelings and empathy of the Judge.</p>
<p>Will some one please explain to Obama that the laws are what we go by in the JUSTICE SYSTEM and he appoints &quot;someone who understands justice and isn&rsquo;t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book&quot; he will be making a self admitted UNCONSTITUTIONAL decision based on personal feelings. Undermining our Judicial System with someone appointed for reasons other then what the Constitution and OATH they take stands for is nothing other then TREASON. I am so tired of this daily bold and belligerent OFFICIAL activity by the President, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Frank, and to many to mention it makes me sick to my stomach that the people that understand how we can make this stop with protections put in place to end the lunacy.</p>
<p>WILL ANY ONE PLEASE START THE BALL OF AMERICAN JUSTICE ROLLING. I know the solid patriotic, law bidding, hard working, honest and a Constitution, bible, gun hugging loyal American Citizen knows what is right for our country. </p>
<p>Our congress must watch this and other actions that will affect the next election and many to follow. It takes longer to fix something then to break it but it will always be fixed. Only the damage done during is unrecoverable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Day 2 - Reactions to the Souter Announcement &#171; Justice Chatter</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/01/a-supreme-court-vacancy-what%e2%80%99s-at-stake-what%e2%80%99s-required/#comment-30580</link>
		<dc:creator>Day 2 - Reactions to the Souter Announcement &#171; Justice Chatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=6064#comment-30580</guid>
		<description>[...] to consider the umpire standard invoked by then-Judge John Roberts. Heritage praised Roberts&#8217; analogy because an umpire &#8220;doesn’t bend the rules for the game, but just calls them as he sees them; someone who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to consider the umpire standard invoked by then-Judge John Roberts. Heritage praised Roberts&#8217; analogy because an umpire &#8220;doesn’t bend the rules for the game, but just calls them as he sees them; someone who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

