• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • WaPo: Why deny D.C. Children What Special-Needs Students Get?

    This morning, the editors of the Washington Post once again highlighted the need to give disadvantaged families the power to choose the right school for their children:

    The Supreme Court will hear arguments today about the use of public money for the private schooling of children with special needs. It’s interesting to note what’s not at issue: namely, that when a public school system is unable to provide an appropriate education, it is obligated to pay the costs of private school. Too bad poor children don’t have that unassailable right; if they did, there would be no controversy about the District program that gives vouchers to low-income children to attend private schools.

    The Post provided more information about the Supreme Court case in an article yesterday. Their editorial argues that the case demonstrates how public funds following children to private schools that best meet students needs is common practice in American education:

    To hear critics of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program tell it, the use of public money for private schooling is as unprecedented as it is undesirable. But, as education think tank founder Andrew J. Rotherham recently wrote on his Eduwonk blog, “Public funds and private schools are plenty entangled now and the idea of bright lines is a rhetorical fiction.” In addition to the billions of dollars spent annually on private school tuitions for students with disabilities, he noted, private schools get public money for books, technology, teacher training and Title I services. As long as the money is seen as benefiting the child, it is deemed a proper, even desirable, use of public dollars…
    …Public schools should be pressed to do a better job for students with disabilities and students without. But there are schools in Washington where statistics show that failure is almost guaranteed. If a school system can’t educate a child — whether because of acute special needs or its own historical failings — why should that child not have options for a “free appropriate public education”?

    The Post’s editorial raises an implicit question: why are opponents of school choice so hostile to vouchers when they seem to have no problem with other programs that let parents and students choose the best school for their children?. We raised a similar question in a past article that considered when liberals love school vouchers.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to WaPo: Why deny D.C. Children What Special-Needs Students Get?

    1. Spiritof76, New Hamp says:

      Sad aspect of the public schools today in the US is not about the kids. It is about teachers' union and the political power to ensure entitlement for their members' benefits. Parents often go along with the propaganda of the school bureaucracy without realizing that their children can not compete with kids from other countries. It can not go on for long without the whole thing collapsing like a house of cards.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×