• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Two Decades of Investment on Display

    us_china_navies

    This week, China celebrated the 60th anniversary of the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) with a large military parade to display to the world how far the PLAN has come and where it intends to go.

    The scope of China’s military advancements in recent decades was summarized well in the Pentagon’s new 2009 Report to Congress:

    On March 4, 2008, Beijing announced a 17.6 percent increase in its military budget to approximately $60 billion. China’s military budget doubled between 1989 and 1994, and almost doubled again between 1994 and 1999. The 2005 military budget was almost ten times the 1989 military budget. If these trends continue, China’s military budget for 2009 will nearly double the 2005 figure.

    A large portion of China’s growing military investments has been directed towards its Navy. While in total capability the PLAN still pales in comparison to the U.S. Navy, the upwards trends in China’s growing fleet—in both quality and quantity—over the past two decades intersects with receding fleet size of the U.S. Navy.

    While China insists its military growth is consistent with its great power status and defensive in nature, its build-up of offensive capabilities across the Taiwan strait and its investment in disruptive military technologies like direct-ascent anti-satellite weapons, nuclear submarines, anti-ship missiles, and robust cyber warfare capabilities send a different message.

    For the U.S. to continue to protect its interest throughout the blue waters of the Pacific and Indian Oceans—maintaining influence, protecting trade routes, and reassuring allies—the nation will require a Navy capable of generating sustained access above, on, and below the seas.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Two Decades of Investment on Display

    1. Semper Fidelis says:

      Unfortunately, our current administration will wait for a crisis before being reactive (maybe) as opposed to being proactive. Copy and concur Mackenzie.

    2. Pingback: Two if by Sea « Maenianum Secundum

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×