• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Public Health Plan “Trojan Horse”

    Former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary and Utah Gov. Michael Leavitt warned yesterday that a public health insurance option in any comprehensive health reform would be the “Trojan horse” that would force Americans into a single-payer health system.

    Proponents for a public health insurance plan, which has been suggested to be modeled after Medicare, employ “a real clever use of language,” using words like “choice” and “competition” when discussing the plan, Leavitt said in a conference call — one of his first commentaries since leaving the federal health agency that runs Medicare, Medicaid and other public health programs. “But it shouldn’t be called a public option; it should be called a government option,” he said.

    Leavitt, who also released an op-ed today, echoed results from a leading health-care consulting firm that a public health insurance plan “would be a gateway to 118 million Americans losing options and real choice in their health care.”

    “So why would it be bad if people opted for a public plan,” Leavitt asked rhetorically during the conference call. “Well [proponents] suffer under the illusion that Medicare is run more efficiently than private health insurance. We issue more checks but the efficiency of health care shouldn’t be measured in the volume of [reimbursement] checks you administer. It should be in the value of care you provide,” Leavitt said.

    During his tenure at HHS, Leavitt said Medicare has been “uncoordinated” in its delivery of health care to America’s elderly and disabled, and moving the nation closer to bankruptcy. “The current economic problems may be an earthquake, but [the financial strains that are] coming with Medicare are a tsunami.”

    To avoid leading America’s health care sector toward the pitfalls of a single-payer system while implementing real reform, Leavitt highlighted alternatives that Heritage policy analysts have been advocating:

    “There is a clear role for government in health care reform, but it should not be the voice that substitutes American consumers who are armed with information about costs and quality options in their health care,” Leavitt added.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to The Public Health Plan “Trojan Horse”

    1. jill, memphis says:

      I like the analogy of the trojan horse. When I read the same article I thought of the old game show where you choose between two curtains, without really knowing what is behind either of them. There is a neurosurgeon from Chicago who is writing about these topics quite frequently at http://www.healthandsharing.com Interesting to get a surgeon's perspective. Click on the archive link to see his recent postings.

    2. Pingback: The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » MIDDAY ROUNDUP

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×