<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is Blue State Digital in Iraq: Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Walker</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/#comment-57655</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=5648#comment-57655</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, 
 
Whether or not you like Obama, you have to admire the smarts behind the campaign and mass mobilization of so many in his political movement. BSD were the brains behind much of this, and are quite definitely market leaders in creating mass movements. You think some GoDaddy or AT&amp;T executive in a suit will give better advice? ...or be less after growing their own business? I think not. 
 
I don&#039;t see anything wrong with this! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#039;mon,</p>
<p>Whether or not you like Obama, you have to admire the smarts behind the campaign and mass mobilization of so many in his political movement. BSD were the brains behind much of this, and are quite definitely market leaders in creating mass movements. You think some GoDaddy or AT&amp;T executive in a suit will give better advice? &#8230;or be less after growing their own business? I think not.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t see anything wrong with this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll &#187; Why is Blue State Digital In Iraq?</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/#comment-29234</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll &#187; Why is Blue State Digital In Iraq?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=5648#comment-29234</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s the question that the Heritage Foundation&#8217;s &#8220;Foundry&#8221; Blog is asking:   Yesterday, we learned that the State Department had flown a delegation of new media experts to Iraq to consult with government officials and entrepreneurs on digital technology. The delegation made sense for several reasons, including the vast amount of digital talent that had been assembled. However, we couldn’t understand why Blue State Digital was in Iraq? This was a company that unlike AT&amp;T, Twitter, Google, MeetUp and Wired, was relatively unknown and not an industry leader in really anything.It was then discovered that Blue State Digital is the official digital arm of the Democratic National Committee, Obama for America, and countless other liberal organizations, trade unions and political candidates. So why did they merit the distinction of serving in this delegation over say, GoDaddy.com executives, or other non-partisan website developers? Hoping it wasn’t about securing government funded contracts and business for a political pal, we waited to hear the reason. Today we have an answer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s the question that the Heritage Foundation&#8217;s &#8220;Foundry&#8221; Blog is asking:   Yesterday, we learned that the State Department had flown a delegation of new media experts to Iraq to consult with government officials and entrepreneurs on digital technology. The delegation made sense for several reasons, including the vast amount of digital talent that had been assembled. However, we couldn’t understand why Blue State Digital was in Iraq? This was a company that unlike AT&amp;T, Twitter, Google, MeetUp and Wired, was relatively unknown and not an industry leader in really anything.It was then discovered that Blue State Digital is the official digital arm of the Democratic National Committee, Obama for America, and countless other liberal organizations, trade unions and political candidates. So why did they merit the distinction of serving in this delegation over say, GoDaddy.com executives, or other non-partisan website developers? Hoping it wasn’t about securing government funded contracts and business for a political pal, we waited to hear the reason. Today we have an answer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why are Leftwing &#8216;Media Experts&#8217; in Iraq? &#171; The Foxhole</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/#comment-29168</link>
		<dc:creator>Why are Leftwing &#8216;Media Experts&#8217; in Iraq? &#171; The Foxhole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=5648#comment-29168</guid>
		<description>[...] So, this is indeed about government contracts and business prospecting at the expense of taxpayers for the President’s campaign buddies. http://www.foundry.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, this is indeed about government contracts and business prospecting at the expense of taxpayers for the President’s campaign buddies. <a href="http://www.foundry.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foundry.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankhagan.com &#187; Graft Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/#comment-28922</link>
		<dc:creator>frankhagan.com &#187; Graft Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=5648#comment-28922</guid>
		<description>[...] The Heritage Foundation blog has an update this morning: Reporting on the ground in Iraq is Wired.com Senior Writer Steven Levy who says: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Heritage Foundation blog has an update this morning: Reporting on the ground in Iraq is Wired.com Senior Writer Steven Levy who says: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT Sterling, VA</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/#comment-28919</link>
		<dc:creator>BT Sterling, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=5648#comment-28919</guid>
		<description>Why is it that American citizens have to watch these cronies, (I&#039;d rather use another word that begins with an A and ends with an e) in the House of Rep. and Senate on a daily bases.  They were elected to represent us and on our behalf......not THEIRS! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that American citizens have to watch these cronies, (I&#039;d rather use another word that begins with an A and ends with an e) in the House of Rep. and Senate on a daily bases.  They were elected to represent us and on our behalf&#8230;&#8230;not THEIRS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lohnes Las Vega</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/#comment-28854</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lohnes Las Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=5648#comment-28854</guid>
		<description>Considering Obama&#039;s attitude towards America, when he is shmoozing with banana republic dictators, why should we think Obama will have Iraqs&#039; best interest in mind. Hera&#039;s a policy Obama has,&quot;Embrace Americas&#039; enemies, and condemn Americas allies.&quot; That blue state digital is just marxist, left wing, Soros funded, propaganda that will undermind Americas&#039; interest with Iraqi government. Why would anybody think Obamas&#039; track record would be any much better from now on? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering Obama&#039;s attitude towards America, when he is shmoozing with banana republic dictators, why should we think Obama will have Iraqs&#039; best interest in mind. Hera&#039;s a policy Obama has,&quot;Embrace Americas&#039; enemies, and condemn Americas allies.&quot; That blue state digital is just marxist, left wing, Soros funded, propaganda that will undermind Americas&#039; interest with Iraqi government. Why would anybody think Obamas&#039; track record would be any much better from now on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is Blue State Digital in Iraq: Update » The Foundry &#171; MY WP</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/22/why-is-blue-state-digital-in-iraq-update/#comment-28825</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is Blue State Digital in Iraq: Update » The Foundry &#171; MY WP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=5648#comment-28825</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpt from: Why is Blue State Digital in Iraq: Update » The Foundry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from: Why is Blue State Digital in Iraq: Update » The Foundry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

