• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Earth Day Update: Life, Liberty and Property

    Before Thomas Jefferson penned in The Declaration of Independence, writing that we are endowed with “certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” it was philosopher John Locke who believed “no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.”

    Indeed, private property rights are critical to a nation’s economic growth and prosperity. Whether or not a country has established private property rules is a key indicator in The Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom. But property rights also play an extremely important role in environmental protection and improvement.

    When property rights cease to exist, people do not have the proper incentives to devote their own resources to protect and improve their land. In this instance, what’s referred to as the tragedy of the commons occurs. Think about your office refrigerator versus your fridge at home. Chances are one is much cleaner while the other is cluttered and has more rotting food. No one has any incentive to clean the fridge or they expect someone else to do it for him.

    Furthermore, people are much more inclined to litter in a park than their own backyards. While this has environmental consequences of its own, the damage can occur on much larger levels. Overfishing, overgrazing, forest degradation are examples of overusing the earth’s resources when property rights are not clearly defined. (Tangentially, privatizing the ocean could be a possible solution to prevent pirate attacks.)

    Moreover, no one is preventing environmental groups from purchasing land to protect it. In fact,

    private property rights make it possible for environmental groups such as the Nature Conservancy and Ducks Unlimited to protect habitat by purchasing land and establishing wildlife preserves.”

    Having the federal government own the property is just as bad as no one owning it, if not worse. Take National Heritage Areas, for example. The process for forming a National Heritage Area (NHA) begins when an individual or group identifies a perceived historically significant property. “Historically significant property” is defined by the NPS as “a place designated by the U.S. Congress where natural, cultural, historic and recreational resources combine to form a cohesive, nationally-distinctive landscape … [to] tell nationally important stories about our nation,” so just about any parcel of land or long-standing structure could be touted as an intricate part of someone’s history and become eligible for federal subsidies.

    federally-owned-land

    National Park Service (NPS) advocates and staff have long complained about the lack of resources that Congress provides in comparison to its extensive responsibilities. Both the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service estimate that the cost of NPS’s maintenance backlog exceeds several billion dollars and is rising despite increased annual appropriations. Park attendance has been in decline in recent years, and camping in the parks has decreased, perhaps in part because of the functional obsolescence of campground facilities. Some of this decrease in recreational usage can be attributed to silly provisions such as bans on snowmobiles and ATVs, which significantly reduce tourism and hurt local economies.

    Improving and protecting the environment is undoubtedly a good thing, but the best means to an end is establish and protect property rights and give the land back to the people.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Earth Day Update: Life, Liberty and Property

    1. Jorg Lueke, Oakdale says:

      What you write is true in certain cases, but the private ownership side also has it's issues. There are places that really should be accessible to all. These could be managed by private concerns true, but then that requires oversight and bureaucracy as well. In some cases cutting out the middle man and managing land directly may be the most efficient.

    2. T.Maguire, Arizona says:

      The founding fathers – predicting land grabbing by a too powerful federal government – limited land owned by the federal government, not to exceed 10 square miles (USC Art 1 Sec. 8) *excepting "forts, magazines, dock yards & other needful buildings".the amount of land that we have allowed them to swipe from sovereign states is nothing less than theft! The GSA's numbers also fail to add Indian reservations. The numbers are substantially higher. This is not to say that lands should not be preserved for any number of reasons; it is just another indication of functions which could be perfectly well managed by local & state governments being used by the Feds to exert more & more power.

    3. Earl, QUEENS, NY says:

      So today is 'Environmentalist Wackos Day'?? In honor of this day, why not have tea-partiers, et al, at opposition events, i.e. talking about the EPA and environmentalist wackos in action!! I.e., the punishment of the farmer who accidently ran over a kangaroo rat with a tractor!! Or about the consequences of the water supply being cut off in California, just to protect a little species of fish!! We can also show pictures of spotted owls, and explain how the environmentalist wackos care more about them than the American people or our economy!! Better yet, let's look at some scenes from this past harsh winter – all the blizzards and record cold. This is all 'global warming in action'!!!! It's hard to believe that all of the lunacy listed above is actually happening, and the American people haven't taken corrective action or fought back yet!! We should have our own event – come November, let us….."GO GREEN – RECYCLE CONGRESS"!!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×