• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Medvedev Flirting with Democracy: What Stands Behind

    The past week saw an unprecedented number of President Dmitry Medvedev’s public acts towards civil society institutions. He was interviewed by the opposition newspaper Novaya Gazeta, met with representatives of civil rights NGOs and had a protracted televised talk on NTV channel deemed the most liberal of the government-run television channels.

    The President said the right things – that Russia’s democracy was similar to everybody else’s and did not need to be adapted, that political rights and freedoms cannot be traded for stability and prosperity and NGOs are an inalienable civil society institution. Medvedev also supported softening NGO legislation.

    Many experts interpreted Medvedev’s pronouncements as covert polemics with his predecessor Vladimir Putin who repeatedly said democracy needed to be adapted to Russian environment and did his utmost to solidify government control over NGOs.

    What urged Medvedev to flirt with democracy? Admittedly, Medvedev – both in his antecedents and upbringing – has a different cast of mind than Putin and could be more receptive to liberal ideas. However, his long-term work with Putin and his retinue and his enduring dependence on Putin’s clan hampers Medvedev in pursuing an independent policy over the delicate issue of the government’s relations with Russia’s fledgling civil society.

    Then again, dramatic changes in the country on account of a profound economic crisis demand that the incumbent regime makes certain adjustments to political slogans and approaches. The Moldovan developments a couple of weeks ago seem to have shown the Kremlin how spontaneous, resolute and even harsh can the response of the active portion of the people be to the authorities’ actions they are disaffected with.

    Opposition political parties and NGOs that use the Internet are becoming powerful tools of political struggle the government has to reckon with. Thus, it looks like the Kremlin stepped up its public relations campaign towards the news media and NGOs by demonstrating its readiness to reach out to them.

    Tellingly, this readiness is manifest in the President’s rhetoric only. His statements and promises have yet to be backed up by specific actions and laws. They would be the true yardsticks of Russia’s freedoms and nascent civil society.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Medvedev Flirting with Democracy: What Stands Behind

    1. Spiritof76, New Hamp says:

      Let us face it. Do you think we have Constitutional government in the US? At least in Russia, they have flat tax of 12%. That is lot more than what we can say with the destruction of liberty going on in the US.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.