Nationalizing Chrysler
Posted April 17th, 2009 at 9.08am in Enterprise and Free Markets.

“Let me be clear: The United States government has no interest in running GM,” President Obama said just three weeks ago. He continued: “We have no intention of running GM.”
But what about Chrysler?
In a letter to employees released late last night, Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli stated that, under the evolving terms of the company’s deal with the government, “a board of directors for Chrysler will be appointed by the U.S. government and Fiat.” This board, he explained, will appoint its chairman and “select a CEO” and other executive officers of the company.
In other words, all of Chrysler’s decisionmakers will be government appointees. The government will, in effect, run Chrysler. This would be de facto nationalization of the smallest, and least significant, of the Big Three.
“The majority of the directors will be independent,” Nardelli assures us, but that just means they won’t be employees of Chrysler or Fiat. Independent from the federal government and politics? Not so much.

April 17, 2009 MAS1916 - Denver, CO writes:
This is a very expensive way to kill Chrysler.
Firstly, this is being done to save the UAW contracts in place with the automaker. Filing bankruptcy - which would be the proper thing to do - would allow the company to renegotiate all burdensome deals. They would then have a shot at recovery.
Who in his/her right mind is going to buy a car from a government run company? Who will invest a dollar that she/he cares about in a company that is run by the Obama administration?
Chrysler is headed for failure because of poor business decisions and contracts that are inappropriate for the current economic climate. Obama’s entry into the company won’t solve either of those problems.