- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Gates’ Defense Budget Fallacy

Posted By constancerapkoch On April 14, 2009 @ 2:14 pm In Ongoing Priorities | Comments Disabled

 A military truck carries a long-range Shahab-3 ballistic missile during a military parade in Tehran on September 21, 2008 to commemorate the 28th anniversary of Iran's 1980-1988 war with Iraq. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said today the country's military will "break the hands" of invaders if attacked, amid its continuing nuclear standoff with the West.

What will the military look like in 2019? That is a question [1] that is being asked in light of Secretary Gates’ proposed defense budget cuts. In 2019 it will appear that Gates’ proposal for short-term savings will have jeopardized future readiness. Instead of focusing on evolving threats the U.S. military will have stayed in a state of limbo. Modernization will have come to a halt.

This is evident in the reduction of missile defense funding Gates proposed. The decrease of $1.4 billion [2] will essentially stop the development of more advanced missile defense systems. Gates relies on the logical fallacy that since Iran and North Korea missiles cannot reach U.S. soil they pose no serious threat to national security. While proposing these cuts North Kore [3]a saw fit to launch a ballistic missile test in response to U.S. apathy.

Missile defense is not the only system awaiting its execution. The conventional forces stand to lose the F-22 program in favor of the less expensive F-35. Unfortunately, the F-22 and F-35 were designed to work together. The F-22 conducts long-range strikes and penetrates sophisticated air defenses clearing a path for the F-35. Other cuts have been proposed for U.S. Navy and Army conventional systems as well.

Defense spending is not the cause of economic problems in the U.S. It is quite the opposite. In fact, it only amounts to less than four percent of the gross domestic product -half the level it was during the Cold War. Defense cuts are not a panacea. In fact defense spending cuts have the opposite effect when they hurt military readiness and cost thousands of jobs. Gates needs to keep in mind that the threat landscape changes constantly and to provide for the common defense means modernizing the force. No one wants to be saying “I told you so” 10 years from now.


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/14/gates%e2%80%99-defense-budget-fallacy/

URLs in this post:

[1] question: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/jamescarafano/Obamas-penny-wise-pound-foolish-defense-budget-42891982.html

[2] $1.4 billion: http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2394.cfm

[3] North Kore: http://www.foundry.org/2009/04/10/reporting-on-missile-test-fails/

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.