• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Scud in a Bucket

    US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates delivers remarks regarding his US Defense Department budget recomendation for 2010, on April 6, 2009 at the Pentagon in Washington,DC. Gates announced Monday that his recommended defense budget would "profoundly reform" military spending, calling for cuts to major weapons programs such as F-22 fighter jets. "If approved, these recommendations will profoundly reform how this department does business," Gates told a news conference.

    Secretary of Defense Robert Gates budget proposal includes a $1.4 billion cut to missile defense. In The American Legion Magazine Heritage analyst James Carafano outlines just one reason such cuts will leave America more vulnerable:

    Today, the nature of a nuclear threat is different. The United States is less concerned about massive retaliation from another nuclear-armed state and far more worried about a rogue nation or transnational terrorist group that might try to land a sucker-punch, especially if they think they can deliver the blow without leaving a return address.

    Several credible scenarios present themselves. … Put a nuclear-tipped Scud on any kind of ship, and you have a “Scud in a bucket.” The idea seems to have occurred to some who do not wish us well.

    Terrorist-friendly Iran, for example, is developing the capacity to build its own nuclear weapons. The Iranians have also conducted missile tests from sea-based platforms. In these tests, they have detonated warheads at the high point of the missile trajectory rather than at the aim point over the target.

    Connect these dots, and you get an unpleasant picture. The tests certainly appear to be part of a research program to develop a covert means of launching an EMP attack against the United States. A short-range ballistic missile could be carried on board one of the thousands of commercial freighters sailing in U.S. waters every day. Without ever piquing the interest of the Navy, the Coast Guard or the Customs and Border Protection, a ship could sail within range and deliver its payload over U.S. territory. Even a modest warhead placed at the right spot over the east coast could take down 75 percent of the electrical grid.

    Missile defense is a game-changer. … The mission is simple: shoot down the enemy missile as it is being fired into space. That would not only minimize the EMP threat, it would also address the danger of anyone shooting a missile tipped with a nuclear, biological, chemical or explosive warhead at a U.S. city.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Scud in a Bucket

    1. Jim Delaware says:

      I agree with the concern raised in the article. There has long been a concern about the effects of an EMP attack. The theory is that a nuclear weapon that detonates above the US could effectively shut down our electronics thru an EMp effect. Worst case scenarios depict 90% casualties in the months to follow due to starvation, lack of medical resources, exposure to the elements. This allows rogue nations who develop the capacity for nuclear warhead distribution a powerful weapon. Only one or a few of these weapons could cause devastation that we may never recover from.

      Due to this type of threat, a missle defense system is needed now more then ever.

    2. mark elder, texarkan says:

      What is to prevent one from launching it out of mexico? If we can not seem to regulate our own border let alone a sight 50 or 60 miles south of the border it seems to me that one could be launched from south of the mexico line or for that matter right on the border America is being held hostage by the idiots that run us…

    3. Pingback: PA Pundits - International

    4. Tommy , Maryland says:

      A nuclear tipped SCUD – launched from an innocent-looking merchant ship several hundred miles off of the US Coast is not a new concept. The ARMED FORCES JOURNAL (AFJ) featured just such a scenario on page 32 of its' January 2004 edition. Among other things- the AFJ article recounted how the US NAVY experimented with captured NAZI V-1's and V-2's from 1946-1949. The 2004 Armed Forces Journal (AFJ) article was entitled "Up Close andPersonal" -and addressed what type of forces and platforms would be needed to interdict such "launch ships" – before they launch a SCUD to "nuke" the USA. Neither the author of the article (Thomas W. Strother) nor the article itself ever gained much acclaim- but the article is eerily prescient.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.