• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Dining Out on the Taxpayer

    In economics, one of the first lessons is that there’s no such thing as a free lunch. But what the federal government has been doing to the nuclear energy industry and the nuclear energy ratepayers is just about the closest one can get to a free lunch.

    Charged with managing nuclear waste in the United States, the federal government has not collected one atom of spent nuclear fuel. Instead, the government has collected a whole lot of money. About $30 billion from U.S. nuclear-power ratepayers. Fed up, states governments are beginning to take matters into their own hands:

    Several legislatures of states with nuclear power plants are considering stopping or reducing payments to the federal government for nuclear waste management until the proposed Yucca Mountain, Nev., repository opens or another solution to the waste problem emerges.

    Maine lawmakers passed a resolution yesterday asking the federal government to immediately reduce fees paid by electricity customers for managing spent nuclear fuel. The resolution also urges the expedited establishment of two federally licensed interim storage facilities that would take possession of the waste and create an independent panel to assess the long-term prospects for handling military and civilian nuclear wastes.

    Other states, which are obligated to pay much more than Maine, are considering even stronger measures to pressure the Obama administration and Congress. There are about 55,000 tons of civilian high-level waste in more than 120 locations in 39 states waiting for disposal.

    Minnesota state Rep. Joe Atkins introduced legislation that would hold Minnesota waste-fee payments — about $13 million per year — in escrow until DOE “can show that a federal repository is operating and currently accepting such material.” Minnesota has paid about $659 million, including interest, into the fund.”

    The most prudent approach, albeit challenging and comprehensive, would be to transfer nuclear waste management to the private sector. For a comprehensive analysis, see Heritage Research Fellow Jack Spencer’s A Free-Market Approach to Managing Used Nuclear Fuel.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Dining Out on the Taxpayer

    1. Brent, Texas says:

      This theme is rampant. Consider Social Security, Lotteries, and Property levied education taxes. Even when there is accountability there is no punishment. At worst some politician will be embarrassed on camera for a few days, then it's all over.

      Policies at the State and Federal level only relocate responsibility. Like a shell game. Never is the actual opportunity of fraud remedied.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.