• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Why Koh Matters

    On the plus side, the New York Times chose to write a story about the opposition former Clinton administration official Harold Koh is facing from conservatives over his appointment as State Department legal adviser. Unfortunately the NYT then completely ignored Koh’s most controversial legal beliefs in support of legal transnationalism. As National Review’s Ed Whelan explains, transnationalism is not an epithet created by conservatives, it is how Koh describes his own beliefs.

    Also at National Review, Andy McCarthy explains why the fight over Koh’s nomination matters:

    This is an argument about policy, not personality, honesty, or qualifications. The mainstream media did not vet President Obama. His transnational progressive positions were not scrutinized — and even though the president is even now on an important trip, crafting new global regulatory arrangements with other heads of state, we still have not gotten anything approximating an examination of Obama’s views. Bluntly, the public has been better informed about Gov. Sarah Palin’s handling of the Alaska State Police than about their President’s fondness for international redistribution of wealth, international treaties, and the transfer of national sovereignty to transnational bureaucracies and tribunals.

    Events like the Koh nomination are the only opportunity we have to highlight and generate push-back on these positions.

    The germane question is: In the course of that deep involvement, what views has he developed and what positions has he taken? It’s inevitable that the State Department and the administration will soon be confronted with questions like, “What will be the effect on our national security if we push ratification of the Law of Sea Treaty — which provides for disputes to be resolved by a mini-U.N. with its own mini-World Court?” I would think most people take as a given that Dean Koh, as an accomplished international law scholar, is steeped in the relevant issues. The only thing that matters is where he stands on them and what advice he is likely to give.

    There is value in principled opposition. It is not about whether Dean Koh has great integrity (he does) and is a highly accomplished scholar (he is). It’s not even just about whether he gets confirmed. It’s about using one of the few avenues available to us to examine a crucial set of issues and influence policy.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Why Koh Matters

    1. Tony United States says:

      Barrack Obama is not the problem. Koh is not the problem. The problem is Americans who have lost the will to FIGHT for what they believe in. Now all we do is "BLOG" while the enemy within has it's way with our backside!

      You tell me one War that was won with debate . . . just one!


      People may not always believe "what you say", but they will always believe "What You Do".

    2. Craig Andrews, Brigh says:

      Harold Koh would set a dangerous precedent if he were added to the administration for it would confer an aura of acceptiblity to his philosophy and place him closer to a Supreme Ct appointment. He is one of the worst threats to the Consitution we could see. The wolves would be in the henhouse indeed.

    3. Lori, IL says:

      When Fox reported on Koh and his policies, my thoughts were, Obama is nominating a very dangerous person who is against America.

    4. Pingback: Those Nutty Extreme Right-Wingers | The Classic Liberal Blog

    5. Arnie Rosner, Founta says:

      Time to fight fire with fire!

      one of Obama's tools
      many references…pick your own

      Google it

      Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

      Download it

      Implement them

    6. Honest Babe, USA says:

      Obama is a oxymoron! Our past, present and future is being controlled by him, his administration and Clinton's administration. He can't stand tall and be heartfelt to the American people. He's a follower not a leader…God help us!

    7. Big bonus says:


      Sorry, but:

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.